----------------------------------------
Yes. Anyone advocating giving up is helping the evil leftists succeed.
Dear friends,
We are within sight of the Emerald City. Take heart! Do not fall asleep in the fields of poppies which bar the way!
Posted on 07/05/2010 10:32:33 PM PDT by jdirt
Mario Apuzzo from the beginning said this case is going all the way to the Supreme Court. As news of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals wears off, take heart in the knowledge, plaintiffs were not expecting a positive ruling. It wasn't too long ago the New Haven firefighters case was overturned after an appeals court voted 2 -1 against.
I woke up this morning with the nine justices names running through my mind, must have been the bbq sausage. BTW how was your 4th?
What is good and at the same time lamentable, is the out of hand dismissal of the Kerchner case. Mario Apuzzo has on his website, "A Place To Ask Questions" articles and essays discussing the pertinent facts of his case. On June 30, Apuzzo updated us with the news his case was in the hands of the 3rd Appeals Court in Philadelphia. Hardly had the ether dried on the pixels of his article, before news 2 days later, of the out right rejection of his appeal. What is good, is it only took 48 hours to get a decision, only two days were wasted, before the case can move up the ladder to the Supreme Court.
What was bad, besides the whole process of mucking around with this Usurper business, is the clownish Catch-22 the appeals court gave as their justification to dismiss. In essence they said we dismissed the Berg case for lack of standing, and this is just another identical case of "no standing". But if you read the ruling against Berg, you'll see the reason for dismissing his case was not related to the Kerchner case as stated Friday.
The Berg case was thrown out for lack of standing because the ruling stated "any person has a right to run for president, irregardless of their eligibility status, the test of eligibility cannot be applied unless and until that person actually wins the election and takes the oath. Therefore Berg was dismissed because he filed in October 2008, a month before the election. The appeals court wanted to ensure every jackalope and freak in the country weren't impinged upon in their efforts to be the prez.
Mario Appuzzo took that timing issue into account, he didn't file his case until January 20, 2009. His time stamp on his electronic filing indicates it was filed as Obama was actually taking the oath of office. Hmmm no standing as in Berg v Obama? It sure doesn't ring true. Not as written by the 3rd circuit appeal when you hold up both cases side by side.
A cute Catch-22 the 3rd circuit dreamed up. You can't be heard before someone is elected, but on the other hand once that person gets elected now you can't be heard because now the prior case's dismissal precludes it. Sounds like a case of judical PMS, one bitchy irrational thought, justified by another equally bitchy irrational thought.
We've got November and we've still got a future ruling from the Supreme Court due us. We also must press our state governments to pass eligibility legislation enforceable prior to the 2012 election. If these fail us then we must take up arms. In the mean time, if we see no meaningful representation after the November 2010 election, we must take to the streets. The time is waning for maintaining a peaceful posture in our protests and assemblies. We need to escalate the costs to the forces behind the usurpation of our government. Rioting and destroying property in Smallville, USA will only hurt the local people, most likely people who agree with us. But there are the 50 State Capitals and Washington DC itself. If we have no just government what do we need these buildings to house these scoundrels for, to mock us?
I've mentioned a couple of our hopes in this endeavor to wrest America from the hands of the Usurper, now I'll close by listing our greatest strength. We've got God.
The question (or statement) isn’t weather or not the majority of the “feds” in the three branches have trampled upon our Constitution...the question is, what do “we” (who care about the Constitution) do about it?
Do we vote in a new round of politicians and hope that they uphold the Constitution? Do we demand that they right these wrongs? If so, does that include demanding that they expose Barry for the usurper he is? Or, do we allow him to go down in history as successfully usurping an entire 4 year term?
IMO, the issue must be pressed until it’s no longer ignored, or catch-22’d away.
Nice!
Judge Carter is a Democrat and O’s boy. He is corrupt with the rest of them. Ditto McChrystal.
Judge Carter is a Democrat and O’s boy. He is corrupt with the rest of them. Ditto McChrystal.
Let’s get started with two conservatives:
Here’s what a Ronald Reagan appointed conservative federal judge had to say about a birther lawsuit:
“This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Constitution. See U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—Chief US District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth in dismissing the Quo Warranto claim in “Taitz v Obama”—April 14, 2010
And here’s what US District Court Judge Clay Land, a former conservative Republican State legislator from Columbus, Georgia who was recommended for a federal judgeship by Senator Saxby Chambliss and who was appointed to the federal bench by George W. Bush had to say: “The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million. See Federal Election Commission, Presidential Pre-Nomination Campaign Disbursements Dec. 31, 2008, http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/
20090608Pres/3_2008PresPrimaryCmpgnDis.pdf.
Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. Press Release, Federal Election Commission, 2008 Presidential
Campaign Financial Activity Summarized (June 8, 2009), available at http://www.fec.gov/press/press2009/20090608PresStat.shtml. It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought.
Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve. Congress has not instituted impeachment proceedings, and in fact, the House of Representatives in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office.
See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Cong. (2009) (commemorating, by vote of 378-0, the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating, “the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August
4, 1961”).”
http://ia311028.us.archive.org/1/items/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605/gov.uscourts.gamd.77605.13.0.pdf
Judge Land called “birther lawsuits” “frivolous” and he imposed a $20,000 fine on Orly Taitz for violations of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Judge Land is also another stooge as are the others. The judiciary is corrupt. Go back to your TV clicker.
----------------------------------------
Yes. Anyone advocating giving up is helping the evil leftists succeed.
----------------------------------------
Yes. Anyone advocating giving up is helping the evil leftists succeed.
Dear friends,
We are within sight of the Emerald City. Take heart! Do not fall asleep in the fields of poppies which bar the way!
Is that Chicago in the background? ;-)
Yes!
Iirc, the court has primary jurisdiction in some cases. Matters between states and the Federal Government, for instance.
Liars and tyrants and bares ...Oh my
Only problem is the Emerald City was a fakery, right? (Never saw the movie...)
But other than that the analogy is apt.
Yeah, I thought about that after I posted. I’m thinking of a “real” Emerald City, not a fake one.
(In Baum’s book, everything looked “emerald” because everyone wore green glasses, yes, even the horses!)
Ah, that rings a bell. I didn’t read the books either, although my kids did.
Soon it will be apparent that the cap is off the bottle, despite all the propaganda contrariwise from Obama Campaign Inc., and his servile ,masked, supporters here on FR.
For example much of it is being filed by Democrats! Glory BE!:
TOTO WINS!
Good luck on that. The probability that Baker will act on that is 0%. Maybe in January when we get a new AG.
You'd think that some people with a "D" after their name would be plenty P.O.'d that they'd been CHEATED -- yes
Well, everyone has been cheated.
Despite attempts to decry the issue and those of us who have carried it forward, it persists, it has not been laid to rest only shoved aside.
That has its detrimental effects, the beginnings for many not so inclined to reasonably doubt the validity of the administration and further scrutinize the actions thereof--actions sufficiently damning in themselves.
This is not a partisan issue, it is an American issue which transcends the relatively petty disagreements of partisan politics and divides instead those who love this country and revere its Constitution from those who loot it with traitorous intent in the quest for lucre and power.
May God help preserve the Republic, and may we be worthy to keep it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.