And that's exactly what Daley's new Gun Law does (there was a thread on it yesterday).
Out of all the items in it that was delineated in the article, only one mirrors IL's state law -- on transporting a weapon. Every thing else is more restrictive. And one part even surpasses Federal Law and BATF requirements for being able to get a Dealer or C&R (collector) License!
In fact the winner of the Chicago Gun Lawsuit, Mr McDonald, 'prolly' won't be able to go through all the hoops, and COSTS, to get Daley's fricken 'gun permit'. So in fact, Mr McDonald won -- nothing.
But all is not lost, 'yet'. It's my understanding a new lawsuit is already awaiting to be filed against Daley. oops I mean 'Chicago' (/s). And there is still that IL State Law that exempts any person, in any city, who uses an 'illegal gun' in defense of his life, family, or property.
Daley just likes wasting *his* taxpayer's money on frivolous 'carp'.
Since when is it OK to charge ANY fee to exercise a constitutional right?
This should be the next pro-gun approach.
Mr. McDonald and I will most likely be dead before this ends, SCOTUS is playing politics and they know it! all SCOTUS did was create a situation with no winners or losers in the political game.