Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last chance for Republicans
The American Thinker ^ | July 01, 2010 | Jerry Shenk

Posted on 07/01/2010 2:57:06 AM PDT by Scanian

In 1994, an electoral tsunami washed House Democrats out of the majority for the first time in forty years. The runoff returned them in twelve years. Four years later, pundits predict another Republican wave in Washington.

Memory won't permit attribution, but someone recently wrote about sine waves, suggesting that politics runs in similar cycles. The facts, though, suggest that, if politics resembles wave action, it is not mathematical sine waves, but more like radio waves in which the frequency and amplitude are constantly variable.

Forty years. Twelve years. Four years? The frequency is increasing. It took twelve years for Republicans to lose their way and return Democrats to the majority, and it appears that Democratic seismic irresponsibility may have shocked Republicans back on track in only four.

In state capitals the economic downturn has highlighted the failures of liberal governance: unsustainable social spending, regulation above job creation, the heavy tax burden on top earners. Voters see it. They have also seen the Obama administration's willingness to paper over those failures with federal stimulus dollars. America is ripe for change.

2010 may be a Republican opportunity, but, since the cycles have shortened, memories of a Republican majority are fresh. In a two party system, the "out" party is the only refuge for an alarmed citizenry. In that context, a reformed Republican may be better than a Democrat, but many voters would prefer politicians who never lost their focus on fiscal responsibility in the first place.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 2010election; biggovernemnt; careerpoliticians; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2010 2:57:12 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

GOP.
The other Big Government, high tax, high debt party.


2 posted on 07/01/2010 3:09:22 AM PDT by Leisler ("Over time they create a legal system that plunders and a moral code that glorifies it." F. Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

The effect that needs to apply to our ‘representative’ government is not sine waves, but corriolis.


3 posted on 07/01/2010 3:12:27 AM PDT by Quiller (When you're fighting to survive, there is no "try" -- there is only do, or do not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quiller
The effect that needs to apply to our ‘representative’ government is not sine waves, but corriolis

Or better yet the Coriolis effect.

4 posted on 07/01/2010 3:19:08 AM PDT by verga (I am not an apologist, I just play one on Television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Seeing how the non-white population votes overwhelmingly liberal and that the non-white population is growing rapidly, Republicans do not have a good future in store for them.


5 posted on 07/01/2010 3:23:11 AM PDT by Silver Sabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
Without standards among the people it's not going to matter who's in the majority in our government. People have to recognize individual accountability and responsibility. This is what we need to re-instill in the psyche of society.

Nothing challenges this nation as much as this will.

6 posted on 07/01/2010 3:29:18 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silver Sabre
Thank you for serving up a perfect excuse to repeat Nathan Bedford's maxim:

All politics of America is not local but ultimately racial.

The problem is that Democrats have known this and exploited this principle for generations but Republicans, typically, are too fastidious to even acquaint themselves with the rules of the game as it is actually played. No better illustration of the inevitable results of the Republicans unilaterally disarming can be cited today than the election of an empty suit and Manchurian Marxist to the highest office in the world.

Barak Obama simply would not be president of the United States if he were white. It is not racist to say so and it is high time it became conventional wisdom.

He was elected largely because a fair preponderance of white voters wanted to atone for a vicarious guilt for an imputed history of slavery and segregation.

But this is not the sole application of the maxim. Of course, not all politics is concluded solely by the issue of race but substantial, indeed, a preponderance of our politics is determined by America's unique race history. Conservatives, Republicans, Libertarians, and just plain old-fashioned middle-class folks who see their country sliding down the scuppers had better understand that this is the way the game is played or they will lose their country to racists.

For example, they better understand that it is all right for them to vote their race if 95% of the American African population obdurately votes their race. If 80% of Jews will vote their ethnicity, is it all right for gentiles to vote theirs? If Hispanics are voting their race, 70% or better, why not Anglos?

Fundamental to freeing 50% of the electorate from the bondage of imputed racism is the understanding and frank acknowledgment that to unilaterally disarm in the face of liberal racism is unpatriotic, self-defeating, and extremely dangerous for your children.


7 posted on 07/01/2010 3:54:38 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Silver Sabre

Without making too much of a point about it, when I was a kid non-whites not only included all non-Europeans, it included all Europeans who did not speak a Germanic Language (English, Dutch, German, Scandinavians), and excluded Hispanics, Irish, Greeks, Italians, even, sometimes, the French, and all Slavs.
Using that definition, the US has had a non-white majority for decades.


8 posted on 07/01/2010 3:59:36 AM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Good night. I expect more respect tomorrow - Danny H (RIP))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

We have the same problem in Canada where our “Conservative Party” hasn’t won a seat in the 3 biggest Canadian cities since 1988 because they are full of non-whites.


9 posted on 07/01/2010 4:03:41 AM PDT by Silver Sabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

We have the same problem in Canada where our “Conservative Party” hasn’t won a seat in the 3 biggest Canadian cities since 1988 because they are full of non-whites.


10 posted on 07/01/2010 4:03:49 AM PDT by Silver Sabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Silver Sabre
Did you just double post for the same reason I did, that Free Republic is hanging fire?


11 posted on 07/01/2010 4:06:14 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Yes I double posted because the website was acting screwy.


12 posted on 07/01/2010 4:07:45 AM PDT by Silver Sabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Silver Sabre

You are right.

Demographic reality plus the usual rotgut class warefare and Bush-bashing politics practiced by the ‘Rats puts conservatives at a rotten disadvantage.

The only hope is establishing a conservative GOP majority in the next Congress which will do everything in its power to institute common sense and fiscal restraint in government which will create a stark contrast to the chaos and misery that Zer0, Harry, and Nancy have thrust upon us.


13 posted on 07/01/2010 4:10:42 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

The question now is this: should Republicans also play race cards in election? By that, I don’t mean Rev. Wright style of flaming racial division, but by encouraging ‘minority’ candidates as many as possible—so long as they hold conservative positions?


14 posted on 07/01/2010 4:11:21 AM PDT by paudio (Mr. 0bama, focus on Gulf, not Golf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

I’ll catch hell for saying this but how many of you can remember 1050’s preachers and moralists warning that amorality, teen culture, and RnR eventually turning the whole country into a giant ghetto?

Isn’t that what we are just about on the verge of becoming a half century later? A people with low standards and weak morality who are only interested in “what’s in it for me” and how many goodies they can squeeze from lowdown politicians?


15 posted on 07/01/2010 4:15:06 AM PDT by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: paudio
Short answer is, yes.

But by that I do not mean that racial minorities should be advanced as party candidates merely because of their race when they do not otherwise qualify as conservatives. We do not need any more flirtations with Colin Powell or his like. As a matter of fact, I was always skeptical about Condoleezza Rice and thought she was overrated. In any event, I did not find her to be sound on domestic issues.

In fact, the Republican Party has shown a regrettable tendency to overcompensate for imputed racism. Hence the election of our chairman of the Republican National Committee.

An example of a minority politician who seems to have the right conservative instincts is the black colonel running in Fort Lauderdale for the house, his name escapes me but he seems to be rock solid.


16 posted on 07/01/2010 4:21:00 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Silver Sabre

The only hope Conservatives have long term is to separate the country on a Red State Blue State basis. Otherwise we eventually won’t even be able to win Texas or Florida just like we can’t win California.


17 posted on 07/01/2010 4:28:33 AM PDT by Silver Sabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Silver Sabre
To quote Reverend Manning, “White Folks ain't gonna take it NO MO”!

LLS

18 posted on 07/01/2010 4:29:59 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
Col. Allen West. He is a good conservative. I hope he wins. As for the overcompensating, if Republicans want to encourage more minority candidates they need to recognize this fact: It is common that people overshoot when it comes to minority. When the minority person is somewhat good, people overestimate him/her. However, when the minority person is somewhat flaw, people would deem him completely useless.

0bama (and to some degree, Steele) is the result of such sentiment.

19 posted on 07/01/2010 4:36:41 AM PDT by paudio (Mr. 0bama, focus on Gulf, not Golf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Don’t forget ever more increasing numbers of government workers who are going to vote democrat as well. The only long term hope is separation on a blue state red state basis.


20 posted on 07/01/2010 4:41:55 AM PDT by Silver Sabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson