Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Deagle
> Heck, I still run Windows 2000 on one of my computers and see no need to upgrade

I run W2K when I just need another offline copy of Windows for a while -- no license requirements. And I have a 10-yr old 800MHz Pentium-3 laptop with 256MB RAM that runs W2K perfectly well, and I use it from time to time to this day for light websurfing while exercising (it's strapped to the stationary bike).

But for serious online work I use Win7 or XP.

88 posted on 06/27/2010 7:52:11 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored

For serious work? I find no difference between Win2000 and Windows XP or Windows 7 for that matter as to getting work done. Now maybe some of your programs actually specify a more modern Windows operating system, but I have not seen that (Win 2000 or later). After all, they try to insure that Windows programs need a particular operating system (for their benefit) but does it really? Most programs work just fine with older systems.

I can understand security as a precaution for using a more modern operating system, but really, unless your connected to the internet (with no firewalls or anti-virus programs), does it matter?

Most user programs require specific processor capabilities and ram, not the latest operating system. They just do not test on older systems...


89 posted on 06/27/2010 8:06:27 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson