She needs to be defeated on this basis ALONE... but I am sure there is more reasons to oppose this nomination.
To: TallyFlPatriot; politicallyincarrect; /\XABN584; 3D-JOY; 5Madman; <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; ...
Specifically, the HSLDA is concerned Kagan may push the Supreme Court to consider a pair of United Nations treaties – the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women – as relevant to cases in the U.S.
This is bad news folks.. very bad.. if you are not familiar with these treaties you really need to wake up..
2 posted on
06/26/2010 4:27:49 AM PDT by
davidosborne
(I am SpartanSixDelta)
To: davidosborne
She needs to be defeated on this basis ALONE...AGREED, this international law and UN crap has got to stop!
5 posted on
06/26/2010 4:36:02 AM PDT by
Marathoner
(And we thought Carter sucked.)
To: davidosborne
From the stated goals of communists read into the congressional record in 1963.
45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.
7 posted on
06/26/2010 4:44:58 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: davidosborne
Are there any Republicans in the Senate with the courage to blue slip Kagan and force Obama to give her a recess appointment? At least that way, her appointment would last until January 2011 and if the Senate has enough Republicans by then, she might NEVER be confirmed.
9 posted on
06/26/2010 4:47:42 AM PDT by
Enterprise
(As a disaster unfolds, a putz putts.)
To: davidosborne
Don’t mess with homeschoolers.
To: davidosborne
Any Republican who votes for Kagan, should be immediately jailed!
19 posted on
06/26/2010 6:04:13 AM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(Support our Troops, and vote out the RINOS!)
To: davidosborne
Good ol' WND...
Has anyone here (other than I) read this these papers that WND cites out of context? If so, why no comments on the actual statements and writings of Elena Kagan?
For example, why are people not commenting how, in the "motive-hunting" line, Professor Kagan was writing about how the SCOTUS had acted since United States v. O'Brien 391 US367, 383 (1968), not saying how she thought they should have acted.
If nothing else, World Nut Daily is amusing. It occasionally pulls the blind squirrel trick, but along with that, it acts with either disregard for the truth or flat-out willful misrepresentation.
21 posted on
06/26/2010 6:07:14 AM PDT by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: davidosborne; Enterprise
Oops..that was meant to be a reply to
#1422 posted on
06/26/2010 6:10:45 AM PDT by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: davidosborne
Our Constitution reigns supreme here in the U.S. What kills me is that the left hates it and want the UN to rule over us. P!ss on them all!
28 posted on
06/26/2010 8:54:19 AM PDT by
rbosque
(11 year Freeper! Combat Economist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson