Child porn involves the inherent harm to others for its existence so it doesn't pass the liberty test.
Public nudity is legal in many places and shouldn't be a criminal act.
Living in a teepee in Times Square would be a violation of other's property rights. That doesn't pass the liberty test.
Starting a Taliban Booster club should be, and probably is, perfectly legal. So is being an Aryan Brother or a New Black Panther. Are you suggesting that the right to associate with others or freedom of expression should be outlawed? It wouldn't surprise me that you did.
By whose definition is this harmful? What about 12 year olds together, voluntarily, paid handsomely, making a film for perverts to watch? Oh that's right, it's still going to be illegal BECAUSE WE MAKE THE MORAL JUDGMENT that is wrong and therefore ban it along with all other types of kiddie porn.
Public nudity is legal in many places and shouldn't be a criminal act.
It is? At a few beaches, mostly private. Should you be able to walk buck naked into a Starbucks? Into the next screening of The Princess and the Frog?
If that's your definition of liberty, you need to find another country, ace.
Living in a teepee in Times Square would be a violation of other's property rights. That doesn't pass the liberty test.
There's plenty of City owned (ie public) spaces within times square. Set up your teepee there. Oh wait, you mean its a moral judgment and therefore law that we do not want people to occupy public spaces with their semi-permanent presence. No stick hut residences in Central Park? No tents on the intersection of 43rd street? Man, what statists!
Starting a Taliban Booster club should be, and probably is, perfectly legal.
I guess not.
Former NY student gets 15-years for aiding al Qaeda
http://thetvrealist.com/gossip/Former-NY-student-gets-15years-for-aiding-al-Qaeda-2711205.html