Skip to comments.
C3PO: “Etiquette and Protocol Robot”
The Virginian ^
| 6/19/2010
| Moneyrunner
Posted on 06/19/2010 7:27:41 AM PDT by moneyrunner
A great deal of the internet is populated by C2PO wanna bees. If you ever watched a Star Wars movie (and who hasnt) you know the shiny gold robot named C3PO whose purpose is etiquette and protocol. The internet has developed its own system of etiquette and protocol. One of these is an abhorrence of what is referred to as link whoring which is defined as encouraging people to click on your website. According to this protocol the internet virgin is supposed to sit demurely on the sidelines, knees tightly together, until she is spotted by a search engine like Google.
This phenomenon was one I recently experienced at one of my favorite sites, FreeRepublic.
(Excerpt) Read more at moneyrunner.blogspot.com ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: blogpimp; bundleofsticks; freerepublic; googlewantsyouto; protocol; supportfrnotgoogle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-188 next last
To: humblegunner
81
posted on
06/19/2010 12:59:37 PM PDT
by
Salamander
(You don't know what's going on inside of me. You don't wanna know what's running through my mind.)
To: Mad Dawgg
Yeah, and then the natural response is, why is it a concern of yours? And why is it a concern of YOURS if anyone points out blogpimps?
82
posted on
06/19/2010 1:02:51 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Pablo is very wily)
To: humblegunner; Eaker
*sigh*
I wish all my ~posts~ were “pay per click” and loaded with web bugs and trackers.
I’d be rich by now.
:[
83
posted on
06/19/2010 1:04:14 PM PDT
by
Salamander
(You don't know what's going on inside of me. You don't wanna know what's running through my mind.)
To: Salamander
"No, they dont, any more than the owner of building has a part in some gang bangers graffiti tag. OK so it is your opinion that if someone paints something on my building without my permission then I don't own it?
Interesting...
Are you a lawyer by any chance?
84
posted on
06/19/2010 1:14:09 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
To: Mad Dawgg
So tell us again why is it you feel the need to do such?Because it upsets blog pimps and the pets that support their faggotry.
I notice that your site tries to set a cookie, which I blocked and tracks visitors.
Maddawggmani... has 1 tracking site in use = TweetMeme
I guess blog pimps of a feather .............
85
posted on
06/19/2010 1:14:09 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(Pablo is very wily)
To: Salamander
"Somewhere around here theres a disclaimer absolving Jim [and co.] of posters opinions and there have been no threats made to the blog pimp, therefore charges of harassment would the last refuge of a sissy." Ok then simple question: Bloggers usually use advertisement on their websites and there fore can male an income from people surfing to their websites, correct?
86
posted on
06/19/2010 1:25:49 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
To: Eaker
"Maddawggmani... has 1 tracking site in use = TweetMeme" TweetMeme is a widget that readers of a blog which uses the widget can tweet a link to it with a single click. Many bloggers use it. It is even embedded in youtube video pages.
BTW FR uses cookies. did you block those cookies as well?
87
posted on
06/19/2010 1:35:52 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
To: Eaker
"Because it upsets blog pimps and the pets that support their faggotry." I see so are you saying people who excerpt their blogs to FR are Homosexuals?
88
posted on
06/19/2010 1:37:27 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
To: Mad Dawgg; Eaker
I see so are you saying people who excerpt their blogs to FR are Homosexuals? Are you saying they aren't?
89
posted on
06/19/2010 1:38:40 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Pablo is very wily)
To: humblegunner
"Are you saying they aren't?" I am not claiming they are or they aren't. Are you claiming they are?
90
posted on
06/19/2010 1:41:01 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
To: Mad Dawgg
Are you claiming they are? I would imagine that staistically the incidence of homosexuality is higher among blogpimps than among normal people.
91
posted on
06/19/2010 1:42:27 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Pablo is very wily)
To: humblegunner
staistically = statistically
GET IT RIGHT!
That’s three today. Johnny, you’re relieved of duty.
Go cook something and watch Stargate.
92
posted on
06/19/2010 1:44:17 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Pablo is very wily)
To: Eaker
If you want to defend them then you are no better than they are and that says a lot about you.
Yes, the ridiculous hyperbole continues! So now I'm the one as bad as a whorehouse operator or a shoplifter!? LOL
First, you better read what I said before commenting. You know, like a normal, decent person would. I was hardly defending him. Just trying to put things into perspective for you since you obviously are lacking in that area.
Second, you better find those meds in a hurry. You want to be stocked up in case you come across something really important...like a spelling or grammatical error. That's as bad as pornography don't you know!
93
posted on
06/19/2010 1:49:31 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: Mad Dawgg
BTW FR uses cookies. did you block those cookies as well? No, I trust FR.
I don't trust blog pimps.
94
posted on
06/19/2010 2:41:56 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(Pablo is very wily)
To: Mad Dawgg
I see so are you saying people who excerpt their blogs to FR are Homosexuals? I didn't say they were homosexuals, I implied that their behavior was faggoty and that you are supporting their faggotry.
Why do you capitalize homosexual? That's kind of faggoty too.
95
posted on
06/19/2010 2:47:12 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(Pablo is very wily)
To: GLDNGUN
First, you better read what I saidOr what tough guy?
96
posted on
06/19/2010 2:49:00 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(Pablo is very wily)
To: Eaker
"I implied that their behavior was faggoty and that you are supporting their faggotry." I see so could you explain to those of us who don't know such what exactly the words highlighted in red above mean.
Because according to the slang dictionary you just contradicted yourself and it is a bit confusing.
97
posted on
06/19/2010 3:14:43 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the next one...)
To: Eaker
Or what tough guy?
Or, uh, you can continue to make a fool of yourself by commenting on things you haven't read and frothing at the mouth because someone posted a link to a conservative blog that hardly anyone has ever heard of or probably ever will.
That's what.
But, hey, don't let me stop you. :-)
The funniest part of this whole episode is your supposed mission here is to rail against this minor blogger so he won't get "hits"; however, I'm sure it's dawned on you that all of the attention you have given him and his blog has surely driven more traffic to his site than he could have ever dreamed of doing without you.
In your infinite wisdom you must have weighed your options - ignoring the entire thread (which is the worst thing that can happen for someone hoping for "hits") OR run your yap and personally attack the blogger while accusing him/her of all kinds of malfeasance, including trying to drive traffic to his blog, KNOWING that would peak people's interest...thus driving traffic to his blog and defeating the SUPPOSED purpose of your comments in the first place.
This can only mean 1 of 2 things. Either your inflated opinion of yourself is so large you actually could care less if he gets traffic from FR (despite your bleatings) AS LONG AS YOU GET TO STOMP YOUR FEET AND SCREAM "LISTEN TO ME!"...
OR...
You are a shill for the blogger in question. Perhaps you 2 are one and the same. LOL
Same result either way, so job well done. ;-)
98
posted on
06/19/2010 3:18:23 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: GLDNGUN
LOL!
A crap load of words to spew to fail at countering sarcasm.
Apparently I have needled you to the point of exasperation.
It was easy too.
99
posted on
06/19/2010 3:34:19 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(Pablo is very wily)
To: Mad Dawgg
If you have educational issues and trouble understanding words perhaps you should address the problem with your parents and spend your video game allowance on a dictionary.
100
posted on
06/19/2010 3:37:03 PM PDT
by
Eaker
(Pablo is very wily)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-188 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson