Replies

Or what tough guy?

Or, uh, you can continue to make a fool of yourself by commenting on things you haven't read and frothing at the mouth because someone posted a link to a conservative blog that hardly anyone has ever heard of or probably ever will.

That's what.

But, hey, don't let me stop you. :-)

The funniest part of this whole episode is your supposed mission here is to rail against this minor blogger so he won't get "hits"; however, I'm sure it's dawned on you that all of the attention you have given him and his blog has surely driven more traffic to his site than he could have ever dreamed of doing without you.

In your infinite wisdom you must have weighed your options - ignoring the entire thread (which is the worst thing that can happen for someone hoping for "hits") OR run your yap and personally attack the blogger while accusing him/her of all kinds of malfeasance, including trying to drive traffic to his blog, KNOWING that would peak people's interest...thus driving traffic to his blog and defeating the SUPPOSED purpose of your comments in the first place.

This can only mean 1 of 2 things. Either your inflated opinion of yourself is so large you actually could care less if he gets traffic from FR (despite your bleatings) AS LONG AS YOU GET TO STOMP YOUR FEET AND SCREAM "LISTEN TO ME!"...

OR...

You are a shill for the blogger in question. Perhaps you 2 are one and the same. LOL

Same result either way, so job well done. ;-)

LOL!

A crap load of words to spew to fail at countering sarcasm.

Apparently I have needled you to the point of exasperation.

It was easy too.

You are a shill for the blogger in question. Perhaps you 2 are one and the same. LOL

You have Eaker's secret. He's my sock puppet!. And humblegunner is another one.

Ssshhhh! Don't let Jim Rob know.