Do you understand the electoral process? Obama satisfied the same state requirements to get on the ballot as everyone else. He won the most electoral votes. Congress certified those results as it is required to.
That's all that has to happen. By definition, the people charged with vetting a candidate's qualifications have accepted said qualifications once those steps are complete. Whether that acceptance meets your personal standards of due diligence means nothing from a legal perspective.
You labor under the delusion that just because some people on the Internet, who lack any actual evidence of wrongdoing, have decided they want to revisit the issue that there is an obligation to do so. That is incorrect. And again, the military is not the fourth branch of government. It has no place questioning the qualifications of a sitting President who has won an actual election and been certified by Congress. That's something the Joint Chiefs of Staff understand very well.
I understand the electoral process quite well and it is corrupt, overly controlled by the two major parties, and is basically, dishonest.
If anyone is delusional, it is people like you, who believe that the guy in the oval office has proven his qualifications, even while at the same time refusing to show the proof and spending time and money to avoid doing so. Normal people recognize that as "guilty behavior."
I have said what I have to say about the military. You are willing to have them follow the orders to carry out a war even when the person giving those orders has not shown the legal authority to do so under the same constitution the military is sworn to defend. I am not so gullible and willing to risk take with our military power.