Posted on 06/13/2010 3:46:39 PM PDT by syc1959
The former Honolulu elections clerk who says President Obama was "definitely" not born in Hawaii and has no birth certificate from any hospital in the Aloha State says he's willing to testify in court to those facts.
"The things I've said, I don't mind testifying in court," Tim Adams, the senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu in the 2008 campaign, told WND in an exclusive interview.
"I was working there, and this is what it was. I'm not a lawyer, just a civil servant. I know what I know. I know what I was told by the hospitals and by my supervisors."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Biden and Pelosi. Who provided the false sworn DNC documentation of the illegal alien and usurper’s “true”(?) eligibility, huh???
Does that make any difference to the facts???
Once he attained the presidency he was guaranteed one term ... there is no way in he** he will be removed from office. It's really an affirmative action thing much like a minority being thrust forward in the academic world. Like Obama who was accepted to Columbia (in spite of very modest academic credentials), just show up at class occasionally & you will graduate. The same with Harvard law school. Also, the same can be said for Michelle & Princeton, she admits her H.S. grades were abysmal.
Which TV?
SRM TV??
How do you manage just to go on the TV with a Soetoro" protecting (bought out) media, how do you do that, hmmmm???
He would be testifying about what he was told - which makes the evidence hearsay, if I understand the law correctly.
Don’t we need direct evidence?
A black pastor in Harlem, N.Y., close to Columbia claims that Soetoro never attended Columbia, but that he was AWOL on other assignments!!!
This guy seems to have some damaging information that puts the Hawaiian’s officials in a very odd position with their previous press releases and the Governor’s visits on different talk shows???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo3Aj2eqmS8&feature=player_embedded
“all just say that it doesn’t matter”.
-—Not anymore. There is an unstoppable downward spiral
that is slowly but surely swirling out and diffusing
Obama’s trumped-up ‘reputation’ and goodwill exactly like the oil in the Gulf. He’s a social and political disaster, and will be perceived as much, and as such, as the Oil Spill is an ecological disaster. What will be interesting to watch will be the point at which the detachment from Obama by the MSM will be effectively COMPLETE, yet will never be admitted to, and the ways in which, for the sake of their own ‘credibility’ , they’ll have to join the chorus of critics. Once they join the chorus of critics, their REAL problem will be to distinguish themselves from the critics, who they’ve been trashing for a year and half, on Obama’s behalf. It will be just as much fun to see the myriad ways they find to tap-dance around that.The MSM is stuck on the classic horns of a dilemma, as they realize it will fully be TWO AND A HALF YEARS MORE of BS they will be expected to promulgate for Zero.
IMO if the normal rules of law were being applied to this case—or to the discovery of public documents in Hawaii and elsewhere—then this case would already be proceeding in the courts.
But they aren’t and it isn’t. No court wants to touch this hot potato and judges and appeals courts are very good at avoiding what they don’t want to handle.
Perhaps, but his testimony would be worthless, as it's pure hearsay.
Besides, how would he know? As an elections clerk, he had no more access to state vital records than the general public.
LOL. Based on what? A bunch of hearsay and innuendo?
You obviously know nothing about the normal rules of evidence.
It makes him less credible as a whitness. Of course, given that his testimony would be nothing more than hearsay, it would have been worthless even if he had come forward in 2008.
#1 placing the birth announcement in the paper and
Nope. The paper printed its announcements based on data they received directly from the Health Bureau. This is clear from the headline on the page where the birth announcents are printed. Reps from the papers have also confirmed it.
#2 filing his birth with the State, something which close relatives were permitted to do in HI
That is simply not true. If he really weren't born in Hawaii, and she attempted registering his birth, she would breaking the law and committing fraud.
It is true that Obama would not be a citizen at birth if he were in fact born overseas in 1961. However, under the Immigration Laws at the time, he was eligible for naturalized citizenship.
Now why would grandma Dunhum, college educated bank manager with no criminal record, risk a felony conviction by fraudulantly registering her grandson's birth, when there was a simple and perfectly legal way of getting her grandson US citizenship?
What could possibly have been the motive for such a fraud?
in the loosy-goosy 50s and 60s as a way of getting population figures pumped up as high as possible.
That is also simply not true. Population figures are based on the census, not not on birth registrations.
We know they read FR.
“Ah, Teabagger Freepers have tuned in to this video (WordPress supplies the referral info), they think because the President could only remember one cone-hatted birthday party in his childhood, despite going to private schools, its proof that hes a forinar. I promise, Im not making this up. They really are that deranged :-) I cant remember any cone-hatted birthdays in my youth, despite going to private schools does that make me an African-born Marxist, Socialist, Communist, Trotskyite, America-hating Muslin? Im not, honest.”
Notice how they try to change the words around and make it appear that he said ONE party with a cone hat.
He said “ AND I HAVE TO SAY THAT WHEN I WAS A KID I REMEMBER HAVING ..U..I THINK HAVING ONE BIRTHDAY PARTY THE WHOLE TIME I WAS GROWING UP.”
http://obamadiary.wordpress.com/2010/06/13/the-pizza-guy/
I hope he shows up for the Lt. Colonel’s court martial. If this is true there will never be a court martial. Either the good soldier will die an unexplained death or he’ll be shipped off in handcuffs to a gulag somewhere and never heard from again. The man’s got guts!
Because the gop is part of the “two part” problem. It sickens me to think of the opportunities this country had for 6 years. And don’t bring up rino’s. If the gop had any guts they’d kick the rino’s out of the party and eventually have a conservative party.
He shows us what an idiot he really is, but we all knew that already. That’s why Jarrett or Axelrod is always with him. to keep him under control. The more I see of him the more I realize what a bumbling fool he is.
I’ll take Biden over that goofy, Marxist Kenyan any old day.
There is a substantial difference between allowing a case to proceed into discovery under the Federal Rules of Procedure—and the Federal Rules of Evidence which would determine what is hearsay and admissable.
I know a little bit. Enough to know the difference between Rules of Procedure and Rules of Evidence.
I haven’t actually followed the various plaintiffs’ filings in this matter, but so far I think the platintiffs have run into summary judgement decisions against them in which the Court says there is no possible circumstances or evidence that would allow them to prevail.
That’s a pretty tough standard to apply as a hurdle for the plaintiff in any case and most judges are sympathetic to plaintiffs that appear to have any case at all. That’s what I’d call the normal course of legal business.
However, it appears to me that the courts so far are treating this issue like a live hand grenade. No one wants to touch it lest it go off in their face.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.