Posted on 06/06/2010 9:49:38 AM PDT by GregNH
>>Good to be careful about what you say on the open forum.
Barak Barry Hussein Sotero Osama Obama is a God forsaken stinking Communist, who doesn’t deserve a 2nd chance at destroying America. Take my name.
ping...
Obama newspaper birth announcement analysis ping...
Obama newspaper birth announcement analysis ping...
I tried reading the blog and looking at the images. I don’t understand what the point of this is. Could you please give a summary of the researcher’s conclusions and why these were drawn?
ladysforest Has updated her post to include by link, here, graphs comparing the matches of birth announcements prior to and after the ONES announcement. Very very interesting indeed....
http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2010/06/06/graphs-and-stats/
I do not know.
“Summery Premise is that the announcements never appeared in the paper and were probably forged. In investigating this premise the researcher discovered that the announcements in both papers did not match in the issues before Obama’s announcement and after, but only on the day OF his announcement. So in digging deeper this researcher also discovers the microfilm appears to be altered. Conclusion: No announcements appeared in the actual paper and the microfilm was altered.”
Thank you. That must be why she mentioned partly unrolling a roll examined, and something about “slices”. However, wouldn’t it take a forensic lab to actually determine if the rolls had been altered? Also, now shouldn’t we be concerned that the evidence will be sequestered so the public an no longer examine it? The various repositories of film most certainly will have an excuse in the pretense of “fear” of theft, etc.
Whatever, a very nice piece of investigative work. I hope it hasn’t been released too soon.
"So, although the Star Bulletin does not have a 100% match (it is 43.9%) THE HONOLULU ADVERTISER, HAS A 100% MATCH TO THE 8/14/61 STAR BULLETIN, in the same descending order. This is the one and only time this occurred in the ten day sample range. Remember that the first obama birth announcement was found in the HONOLULU ADVERTISER. A few other times, there is a full match, but not in exact order. And those do not appear in the same place within the column of announcements.
And
So, we can safely surmise that when Lori Starfelt, the person who claims to have been the first to discover obama’s Honolulu Advertiser birth announcement, made this statement:
“In 1961, the hospitals would take their new birth certificates to Vital Records. At the end of the week, Vital Records would post a sheet that for the news paper to pick up that contained births, deaths, marriages and divorces. The Advertiser routinely printed this information in their Sunday edition. This is not a paid announcement that his grandmother could arrange. This is information that comes from Vital Records – we know this because this particular section reflects those records”
SHE WAS EITHER GROSSLY MISLED OR OUTRIGHT LIED! "
The conclusion is that there were never an actual announcement that appeared in the papers!
In sum, the birth announcements are phony.
So the sticking point in debate was ok, if the BC is phony then explain these birth announcements.
Explained!!!
VERY in-depth investigating .. MUST read at the link ... PING!
So now we should be looking for a cut and paste line in the Star Bulletin that we can determine from where the differences are in the Advertiser...?
Birth announcement new research ping...
I think the dotted lines are created by ripping tape off a dispenser.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.