Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Veteran Journalist Who Broke Sestak Job Offer Story Recounts Interview on Hannity – Video
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | June 2, 2010 | Brian

Posted on 06/02/2010 5:13:31 AM PDT by Federalist Patriot

Here is video of Sean Hannity interviewing veteran Philadelphia newsman Larry Kane, the man who broke the Sestak Job Offer story with an interview he did of Joe Sestak on February 20 of this year. Here’s what Kane asked Sestak that got the entire story going:

KANE: “Were you ever offered a Federal Job to get out of this race?”

SESTAK: “Yes.”

KANE: “Was it Navy Secretary?”

SESTAK: “No Comment.”

KANE: “Was there a job offered by the White House?”

SESTAK: “Yes. Uh, Someone offered.”

KANE: “It was big, right?”

SESTAK: “It was . . . something I won’t comment on” (hard to distinguish his words)

Kane immediately contacted the White House for comment, and 15 hours later they called him back and told him he could say on background that Sestak’s claim of a job offer “is not true.”

Kane’s sources inside the Democrat Party had told him before the interview that pressure had been put on Sestak to get out of the race against Specter.

Kane also said there is no question that the job offered him was a “high-ranking” job, which would not line up with what the White House is now claiming Bill Clinton offered to Sestak for them.

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.net ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: larrykane; sestak

1 posted on 06/02/2010 5:13:32 AM PDT by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Damn... they made an Admiral lie. evil to the bone.

LLS


2 posted on 06/02/2010 5:14:56 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
I just wonder by reading this interview (and hearing it several times): Was Sestak coyly allowing Kane and others to think it was something "bigger" than it really was? Did he think the bigger the offer he was thought to have turned down, the bigger the hero he would be in the eyes of Pennsylvania voters? Did it backfire on him when it turned out to be illegal and he ended up getting the wrong kind of attention? This would have been typical candidate behavior. Yet - Why was Clinton involved?

3 posted on 06/02/2010 5:25:23 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Isn’t that exactly the way the Clinton WH operated... get someone to dishonor themselves, then hang it around their neck... they are good at it too. Its like living under the hierarchy of hell, once you’ve served your purpose, you get thrown into the bottomless pit.


4 posted on 06/02/2010 5:49:47 AM PDT by dps.inspect (uttox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
Your questions and suspicions are on track, I think. If there in fact was only the lesser offer of a panel appointment (both not for the White House to offer and still illegal under the statute prohibiting any interference in an election), it doesn't make any sense for Bubba to be involved. So the alternative explanations are that either Bubba was involved because it was a bigger gig or the White House contacted Sestak directly about the minor job and has since thrown Clinton into the mix as a middleman, naively thinking that makes it ok.

Bottom line is that this must be watched closely and pressure needs to stay on all all players (Obama, Clinton, Sestak, Emanuel) until someone finally cracks (or slips up).
5 posted on 06/02/2010 6:20:54 AM PDT by Apparatchik (If you find yourself in a confusing situation, simply laugh knowingly and walk away - Jim Ignatowski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

I’m no fan of Obama or Clinton, but no one MADE the admiral lie, if that’s what he did. In politispeak: he can take responsibility for that!


6 posted on 06/02/2010 6:24:12 AM PDT by PA BOOKEND
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dps.inspect

satan working behind the scenes. You are correct.

LLS


7 posted on 06/02/2010 6:43:18 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...

The list, ping


8 posted on 06/02/2010 8:41:48 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson