[unseen1]

While I as a member of the masses agree with you. mitt is the front runner irt the GOP elites.

Two different voting blocks and thus two different frontrunners.

I agree that Mitt will be a very bad choice and will do nothing in the primaries if the voters have a choice. that is why the massive effort to get Palin not to run. the Mitt teams knows they can not defeat her at the voting booth.

[Diogenesis]

Bzzzt. Wrong.

NO ONE WANTS MITT "The backstabber and liar" Romney.

Except maybe MLK because they used to walk together.

"Despite outspending his rivals by huge margins throughout the primaries,
(Mitt Romney, Carpetbagger UT,CA,MA,NH,Mexico) lost Iowa, South Carolina, Florida and California.
The only primaries he won were in Michigan, where Dad was governor; LDS states;
and a few states on Super Tuesday in which his California-obsessed rivals
couldn't spare the cash to advertise.
Only John Connolly in 1968 had a worse cash-to-delegates ratio.
And John McCain rightly did not like Romney's tactics during the primaries.
(W)hen (Romney's early leads) started slipping away, he resorted to unfair,
distorted, scorched-earth negative ads, betting that his opponents couldn't
afford to spend enough for the truth to catch up to his charges."
[Romney: A Mistake for McCain, 7/23/2008, Dick Morris]

[Diogenesis]