Posted on 05/24/2010 10:41:16 AM PDT by therightscoop
Watch it here:
They are both anti-birthers.
You’re not paranoid if they’re really after you.
BOR is a clown.
Worse! They are insulting about it.
I never did trust OReilly, but now I will never fully trust Beck either. Both are either phonies or cowards.
Has anyone figured out why BOR referring to Governor Palin as a Blowfish is funny ?
http://www.gop12.com/2009/05/dennis-miller-newtie-and-beauty-for.html
I disagree with the BOR and GB haters. Without them, the communists would have already taken over. I may not agree with everything they say, but compared to the rest of MSM, they are at least putting out info to slow down (and hopefully derail) the train.
BOR is a spinning pinhead.
From SNL skit:
“Just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not after you!”
I agree
BOR annoys me from time to time with his arrogance and i may not agree with everything he spouts but he does help get through a lot of the MSM chatter
It is only going to take one crack being opened and the truth exposed and the Fuhrer’s house of lies will fall. God willing, all the traitors will fall with him including the RATs and RINOs in this Congress.
read later
Being paranoid only means you know they are after you.
Oh I think Beck is dead on target as the Progressives see this as the last stand so to speak in changing this nation into the nanny state and Obama has been being groomed for this role he is now playing for a long time as nothing happens by accident. An example, Bill Clinton he was a nobody in a rural state but the powers that be saw him as a tool and placed him in the right positions but he didn’t live up to their expectations so along comes Obama who is doing their bidding, right on cue.
Everybody will let you down on something.
I gave up on Beck when he spent a whole hour talking about how misguided our military spending is, comparing it to some of the Left wing programs.
Glen, the military is one of the very few legitimate mandates our government has when it comes to spending.
How I hate it when our side tries to set an example for wholesome spending, advocating just the cuts the left have wedged us into accepting.
Horse s—t logic...
The military is the last thing the left wants to spend money on, and the first thing they want to cut spending for. And now Beck is one of them on that topic. Crimeny (made up word, but I like i), no wonder we get our asses handed to us constantly.
Congressman McClintock's Response to President Calderon (delivered on House floor)
FR Posted May 20, 2010 by calif_reaganite
Response to President Calderon
House Chamber, Washington, D.C.
May 20, 2010
M. Speaker:
I rise to take strong exception to the speech of the President of Mexico while in this chamber today. The Mexican government has made it very clear for many years that it holds American sovereignty in contempt and President Calderon’s behavior as a guest of the Congress confirms and underscores this attitude.
It is highly inappropriate for the President of Mexico to lecture Americans on American immigration policy, just as it would be for Americans to lecture Mexico on its laws.
It is obvious that President Calderon does not understand the nature of America or the purpose of our immigration law. Unlike Mexico’s immigration law -- which is brutally exclusionary -- the purpose of America’s law is not to keep people out. It is to assure that as people come to the United States, they do so with the intention of becoming Americans and of raising their children as Americans. Unlike Mexico, our nation embraces immigration and what makes that possible is assimilation.
A century ago President Teddy Roosevelt put it this way. He said: "In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language ... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
That is how we have built one great nation from the people of all the nations of the world.
The largest group of immigrants now comes from Mexico. A recent RAND discovered that during most of the 20th Century, while our immigration laws were actually enforced, assimilation worked and made possible the swift attainment of the American dream for millions of immigrants seeking to escape conditions in Mexico. That is the broader meaning of our nation’s motto, “e pluribus unum” – from many people, one people, the American people.
But there is now an element in our political structure that seeks to undermine that concept of “E Pluribus Unum.” It seeks to hyphenate Americans, to develop linguistic divisions, to assign rights and preferences based on race and ethnicity, and to elevate devotion to foreign ideologies and traditions, while at the same time denigrating American culture, American values and American founding principles. In order to do so, they know that they have to stop the process of assimilation. In order to do that, they must undermine our immigration laws. It is an outrage that a foreign head of state would appear in this chamber and actively seek to do so.
And it is a disgrace that he would be cheered on from the left wing of the White House and by many Democrats in this Congress. Arizona has not adopted a new immigration law. All it has done is to enforce existing law that President Obama refuses to enforce. It is hardly a radical policy to suggest that if an officer on a routine traffic stop encounters a driver with no driver’s license, no passport, and who doesn’t speak English, that maybe that individual might be here illegally.
And to those who say we must reform our immigration laws – I reply that we don’t need to reform them – we need to enforce them. Just as every other government does. Just as Mexico does. Above all, this is a debate of, by and for the American people. If President Calderon wishes to participate in that debate, I invite him to obey our immigration laws, apply for citizenship, do what 600,000 LEGAL immigrants to our nation are doing right now, learn our history and our customs, and become an American. And then he will have every right to participate in that debate.
Until then, I would politely invite him to have the courtesy while a guest of this Congress to abide by the fundamental rules of diplomacy between civilized nations not to meddle in each other’s domestic debates.
Didn’t the Clintons go to some annual Progressives’ retreat for several years before he came out to run for President?
I like GB but I cannot stand BOR.
Well the reason we get our butts handed to us is we allow the same old people drive the train, time for a crew change.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.