Exactly. And we know from Leo’s blog that Okubo released the relevant computerized index data for all vital records on “Obama, Barack.”
It was throught that disclosure of index data that we discovered the marriage index data for Barack Obama, Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham.
We also found that one, and only one, (computer) index record exists in the birth index for Barack Obama, a male, born August 4, 1961. If there were multiple database entries for Barack Obama, such as amendments, etc., then the index data would contain multiple entries. That’s the way electronic databases/indexes are architected. I know that because I am a database administrator.
How about in the case of an amendment for adoption or sex change? Would that show in the index and what would it show?
The index we’re talking about isn’t a computer database index.
I’ve asked to see the transaction log for Obama’s record and the HDOH claims that it would cause “frustration of a legitimate government purpose” if that was revealed. Since that exception to disclosure is for situations where a legal investigation would be frustrated, where people would be able to cheat on tests if they knew the information, where the system would have to be shut down for a time in order to access the information, etc, I asked the HDOH exactly what function would be frustrated.
What I’ve heard from them: crickets. As usual. And the OIP won’t even address my appeal until the HDOH is done feeding me crickets - which could go on forever.
The index we’re dealing with is a “vital event” index. There is one index record for that alleged event, regardless of how the particular claims about that event morph over time. Obama was not born twice so there would not be multiple entries in the birth index data, just as there are not multiple entries in index data for anybody who submits additional documentation for their birth claim.
Except we're talking handwritten indexes at the time and you're talking data entry computer records of some unknown date of recent times. The handwritten entry or entries (county and/or state) from the first and second weeks of August 1961 are closer to the truth than the any data entry made decades later which may or may not have been taken from the index books. Every time information is transferred or re-entered or re-written is that much further from the original and true document. It opens it up for more typos or info left off or numbers transposed or info being mixed up with the one before or after it. Besides, we all know how easy it is to hack computer files. What is needed here in lieu of the actual b/c is the available to the public original handwritten birth index. If there were multiple database entries for Barack Obama, such as amendments, etc., then the index data would contain multiple entries.
That's a big IF. You're assuming everything was entered and everything is up to date with transferring the data. Any amendments would not show up as separate entries anyway because that would not cause his b/c to be moved to a different birth record book. His place in the big book and his number remains the same.