If the posted COLB was authentic that would be true. But what was posted is forged. He can put anything he wants on a forged COLB.
At this point anything genuine would be enough to catch Obama on both points - the dual-citizenship part (because BHO must be listed as the father for him to have the BHO II name) and the birthplace (because the medical portion of the BC was amended, showing that Obama wasn’t in Hawaii to be seen by a Hawaii doctor within the first 30 days after birth).
Without a genuine legal document making claims about his birth there is nothing to argue. That’s precisely why Obama refuses to present a legal document.
The only thing we know for certain about the pictures on the internet, are that they look like a Hawaiian COLB. You cannot prove OR disprove anything with a photo. The only way to do so is to get a hold of the document itself.
We have seen a picture of what looks like a Hawaiian COLB. No one can say one way or the other if it is legitimate or not, that cannot be done with a photo.
If a photo of the COLB were brought into a courtroom, it would be thrown out. You cannot determine legitimacy through a photo. You would have to have the document itself to do that.
I hate to nitpick on things like that, but it is a matter of logic and specificity.