Posted on 05/15/2010 3:27:44 PM PDT by Federalist Patriot
Here is video of Charles Krauthammer reacting to Attorney General Eric Holder's unwillingness to use the term "Radical Islam" to describe what incites terrorists to attack the United States.
Krauthammer said it is absurd to not call the ideology behind the enemy what it is - "Radical Islam." In fact, he likened this politically-correct attitude displayed by Holder in a recent hearing to how absurd it would have been to never speak of "Communism" during the Cold War, or "Nazism" during World War II as the ideologies behind the enemy.
Krauthammer could not be more right! But in the PC world of the Left, you can't let reality get in the way of what you want to believe.
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomslighthouse.com ...
As usual, Charlie makes his point...
Yes. Krauthammer is almost always worth listening to. He has a way of cutting to the heart of the matter.
Didn’t German children sing to Hitler as their “lord?” Wasn’t the emperor of Japan supposed to be a god? Would Eric Holder have said we can’t condemn their religious beliefss?
beliefss = beliefs
Right on Charles. The opposition figure if they can not use the terms (or put their heads in the sand) it will all go away. I got news for them. It’s NOT going away. Wait until November.
It’s a lot like covering for something they don’t want us to know about themselves too. Got Islam, Holder?
Yes. Krauthammer is almost always worth listening to.
I lobby for the elimination of the adjective “radical” when referring to Mohammedanism. Islam is Islam. By definition it is radical; therefore, radical is redundant. sd
I lobby for the elimination of the adjective “radical” when referring to Mohammedanism. Islam is Islam. By definition it is radical; therefore, radical is redundant. sd
I lobby for the elimination of the adjective “radical” when referring to Mohammedanism. Islam is Islam. By definition it is radical; therefore, radical is redundant. sd
Sorry for the triple post. Inattention is the culprit. sd
Very good!
Also - Got Islam, Obama?
Holder doesn’t think there is anything radical about them.
The real hero in all this is Lamar Smith, though.
Islam is what it is and there is no variation within its philosophy, doctrine, or behavior.
Islam is Islam; there is no such thing as a Radical Islam versus Traditional Islam versus Passive Islam. Islam is nothing more than a military and quasi-governmental movement, disguised as a religion to control it’s population. The closest frame work to Islam is Communism, Nazism or Political Environmentalism; could they be considered religion.
Is he a Muzzie? He is if you like that. Is he a Christian? If that makes you happy. A NBC? Maybe maybe not. A socialist or a full blown Marxist? Could be. Would you like him to be? Let's leave that question open too. Is Barry0 for the war on terrorists or against it? Yes, he certainly is and that's his final word on that subject. Does 0bama like the Constitution or hate it? Let him be clear about that. Of course he does, you silly.
On a related note, Bush did us no favors with his “religion of peace” mantra.
Holder and BO have the same skin tone and features. I think they are both Arab Muslims.
gnip
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.