Posted on 05/11/2010 6:32:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The affidavit belongs to the witness.
But she didn't own that one client (Rhodes?) who filed a letter that Taitz was making claims to which she did not consent.
Someone wrote on Rhodes's behalf. We never heard if if that person represented Capt. Rhodes explicitly in the letter to the court. The guy appeared to be putting his own word's in Rhodes's mouth.
She's a nitwit.
She's no more a nitwit than those who take every opportunity to say she's a nitwit.
The mere fact that in the past you consistently refused to respond to any of the evidence I have brought forward because there was nothing you could refute, just goes to show you are WAY out of your league in debating me when it comes to American history and the the original intent of the words set forth in our Constitution by our founding fathers.
Troll - what someone says when they have no ammo.
You never brought any evidence that Obama’s father disqualified him.
I agree that ‘jurisdiction’ means anchor babies are not citizens, and the child of a tourist should also not be considered a citizen...but that is a separate question.
Obama’s mother wasn’t an illegal, nor a tourist. His father was here long term (years) legally on business (education) approved of by the US government.
The question with Obama is NBC, not anchor baby.
“Posters like Rogers do not like America the way they perceive it and are more than onboard for transforming America into the socialist model of their democrat party demigods and international socialist pay masters.”
I’ve been shot at by America’s enemies...how about you?
You have a lot of stuff about ‘religion’ on your home page...does lying about others qualify as godliness in your religion?
“You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.”
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Exodus%2020&version=NIV
After reading your obamanoid sycophantic crapfest at FR for the past three days, I wouldn’t piss on you if you were on fire. And my relationship with the God of Creation is beyond your arrogant purview of understanding so try some other little alinsky ploy, freak. ...
I see you WRITE about scripture, but prefer not to listen to it.
FWIW, that makes you like everyone else I’ve met, including myself.
“19 Know this, my beloved brothers: let every person be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger; 20for the anger of man does not produce the righteousness of God. 21Therefore put away all filthiness and rampant wickedness and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.
22But be doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving yourselves. 23For if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is like a man who looks intently at his natural face in a mirror. 24For he looks at himself and goes away and at once forgets what he was like. 25But the one who looks into the perfect law, the law of liberty, and perseveres, being no hearer who forgets but a doer who acts, he will be blessed in his doing.
26If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this persons religion is worthless. 27Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.”
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James%201&version=ESV
It is in character that you work to deceive people at FR, yet spout the particular scripture you referenced. Want to drag out that other liberal saw, 'He who is without sin cast the first stone' ... or maybe, 'judge not that ye may be judged' ... you shills are becoming so transparent.
And on second thought, if I saw you were on fire, I would toss fluids on you ... and you might be able to figure out why. Your arrogance is almost astonishing ... but not quite, since we've had shills like you working FR for many months now and have seen all your talking points, tricks, bells, and whistles.
Those COLBs online have repeatedly been proven to be forgeries. Here’s why:
BHO’s BC was amended in 2006. To be genuine, his COLBs would have to be stamped ‘AMENDED’. Those are not.
Why you horny bastard! Orly's not associated with this case, We love it when you dopey After-Birthers focus on the left hand when it's the right hand that's about to smack that smirk off your face. LOL
|
obumpa
There is a very good reason that obama will not release a copy of his certified birth certificate.. It can not be proven that he is not a natural born citizen without a CERTIFIED CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH. If he releases a birth certificate it has to say that both his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth otherwise he is in violation of Article 2 of the Constitution and the Congress would be required to VOID his election. Ain’t gonna happen!
I’m having at laugh at how you’re trying so hard to make Obama be a citizen of the United States as per WKA. Obama’s father was here ‘long-term’ on ‘business’?? Please.
Born in Hawaii or the moon..makes no difference..Obama is not a natural born citizen..when and if he produces a birth certificate what will you do next.
The real issue is natural born citizen.
Are you Dr. Conspiracy or one of his minions. You are like a broken record..spinning and spinning for the African..nothing but scratch sounds.
It is over. Obama is not a natural born citizen.
This is the first time I have said this about you..but...you are an Obamabot.
“Cooper attempted to inject some fact-based reality into the conversation.”
Someone please call a plumber, the sewer is backing up again.
After Jensen continued to jump in with his birther conspiracy theories, Cooper asked: Can the colonel not talk for himself? The guys an adult.
I saw the interview. It was actually Cooper who continued to jump in and interrupt, not allowing anyone to answer questions.
On your home page, you write about Christianity and being saved...and then you spew bile and hatred on your posts.
So yes, I’m calling you on it. Either repent, or knock off pretending you are a Christian.
> This is the first time I have said this about you..but...you are an Obamabot. There are a handful of ‘01 & even ‘98 Liberal Freepers who weren't weeded out years ago who still pose as Conservatives yet are really something else ... But like countless Liberals in years past, they will eventually out themselves and be met by a welcome screen that should have greeted them many years ago:
|
That can be said of anyone who has served his/her tour of duty and then chooses to resign, retire, or just not reenlist. Do you have nothing good to say about them as well???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.