Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdWater
Nope. Of course that has nothing to do with this case. When you go into a home that has a dog, the police have a moral responsiblity to do everything they can to protect life, all life and if that means telling the owner from outside the house get the dog under control before they enter. If they do not, they are essentially murderers, since the dog is supposed to protect the owner from intruders anyway.

Protecting the life of that animal is more important than busting the owner with drugs.

The fact they do not think that way is what is so disturbing. They have a callous disregard for innocent life, which makes them evil and dangerous.
58 posted on 05/07/2010 11:23:55 AM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: microgood

You seem to have missed my question to you. You mean you would not shoot a dog that is attacking yourself or your child?


61 posted on 05/07/2010 11:54:04 AM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson