Posted on 05/06/2010 2:57:45 PM PDT by MaxCUA
Jan Evans: Carly Fiorina has been endorsed by the National Right to Life, the California Pro-Life Council, and the Susan B. Anthony List. She is pro-life, pro-traditional marriage, pro-military, and pro-strict border security and against amnesty. She is against Obamacare and will vote to repeal it and prevent the government takeover of private companies and industries. Carly is also a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. Like me, she is a member of the NRA, has a 100% NRA rating, and she and her husband are gun owners. She is pro-energy development and believes as I do in an all-of-the-above approach to energy independence. She is against cap and tax. And most importantly, Carly is the only conservative in the race who can beat Barbara Boxer. Thats no RINO. Thats a winner.
(Excerpt) Read more at citizenpalin4president.blogspot.com ...
You are a tool with no clue, just another knee jerker
Over 3,000 miles away, you don’t understand California politics.
You are in a small homogenous setting with around 620,000
state population.
San Diego County is over 3.4 million population
Reagan couldn’t win in CA today.
I think you mean A poll. And, while Rasmussen enjoys excellent national bona fides, I'm not sure if he's the go-to guy for intrastate polling, especially in California. Plus, even this poll is WELL within the margin of error.
I'll stand by my statement - DeVore is the best conservative, but of the two major GOP contenders, he's the least likely to unseat Boxer.
If I lived in CA, I would vote for DeVore. I do not believe that Fiorina is pro-life, or that if she kinda it , is personal only.
That said, if Palin can use her influence to state Fiorina’s position clearly as pro-life, and Fiorina betrays that in any substantial way, Fiorina can be held accountable. Palin gets her on the record.
Ideally, I’d like someone who really believed, not someone who might stake out a position for political expediency.
But,if you have a viable candidate who doesn’t have much in the way of real depth, you are better off having him on your side than on your opponents’.
Just so long as it isn’t that Islamist snake Tom Campbell, I’d hate to have to vote for Boxer to defeat him, and I would and so would anyone who knew the truth about Campbell.
There’s hardly any difference in how the candidates would do against Boxer. The reason is that whoever runs against Boxer is really running against the Obama agenda. You’re either for it or against it. We have a good opportunity to win Boxer’s seat regardless of who wins the primary. I just don’t want the winner to be seated in the McCain/Gramnesty/Crist/Snowe/Brown caucus.
DeVore has gone into attack Palin mode and again actinng like a 4 year old.
People who live in the world of reality here, don’t want
a person who more than once goes off on a child like snit.
Not Senator material
Palin and the rest of the California right is desperate to stop Tom Campbell first, with weeks to go, Carly has the money and the numbers to stand a good chance of doing that.
Palin can actually help some in the Carly vs Campbell battle, nothing could be done to make Devore suddenly make up a consistent 20 point deficit to knock out Campbell, but Carly has the money and position to close a 4 to 7 point gap with Palin's help, especially if Devore drops out in a week or two.
Funny thing is, the things they fought her on Mark Hurd does all the time (buying into industries). And gets no visible resistance from the board.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.