Posted on 05/02/2010 2:48:01 PM PDT by Texas Peartree
I have always been a fan of Wikipedia. While others question the accuracy of an online encyclopedia where entries are submitted by the public, I believe that the wisdom of the crowd (educated Americans at least) is pretty accurate over time, and certainly more accurate than say the faculty of Yale.
A good friend of mine writes entries for Wikipedia. Today he alerted me to a cover-up of Vera Baker. Who is Ms. Baker? According to the National Enquirer (motto: we got John Edwards, so we are not completely making this stuff up!) Vera Baker is President's mistress, and possibly a space alien.
While Wikipedia was happy to post articles about President Bush's alleged and unproven use of cocaine as a young man, check out this internal debate about whether the Presidents current mistress should have a heavily edited entry in Wikipedia or simply be pulled off of the site entirely: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vera_Baker.
Now, check out the cover up version of Vera Baker that is presented to the public: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vera_Baker.
Hmmm . . . .Seems like Wikipedia has a different set of rules for Republican misdeeds of the 1970s, than for the misdeeds of Democrats here in 2010. Back to Encyclopedia Britannica for me. . .
(Excerpt) Read more at corybirenbaum.blogspot.com ...
I'm guessing that the space alien angle may have something to do with Wiki's decision. Maybe you should try the Weekly World News?
I’m guessing bat boy was involved.
Maybe Bat Boy was the jilted third party in the picture?
I am surprised that Vera Baker is both black and female. You would expect Obama to only want to copulate with white males. But who knows.
It is more accurate to say that Wiki is covering for Obama’s butt.
Who is Vera Baker? And what did she do for Barack Obama?
By Elizabeth Snead |
May 1, 2010 12:12 PM ET
Now a switch hitter.
I’m guessing Wikipedia also covers up any mention of Larry Sinclair as well? And the murder of Donald Young? Wiki sucks.
"It is more accurate to say that Wiki is covering for Obamas butt."
Yes, of course they are. God knows what could happen if it comes out that the President of the United States is sleeping with a space alien. </sarcasm>
Like I’ve always said - brain-dead liberalism is the default position for every organization over time; whether its Wikipedia, Hollywood (who use to be great a long time ago), and, yes, the RNC.
Yes, of course they are. God knows what could happen if it comes out that the President of the United States is sleeping with a space alien.
Obama sleeping with a mistress is light years easier to believe and plausible than sleeping with space aliens.
Well if he is then he deserves everything that happens to him.
You can’t really mean that Obama is your hero.
You forgot the NIPPLE ALERT!!!
Punctuation is your friend, as is accuracy. Both of which were missing in your post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.