Posted on 04/26/2010 3:23:26 AM PDT by iloveamerica1980
You claimed there are no Copyright restrictions on Blogs I just pointed out your factual error.
I never claimed the OPs has a Copyright to the works he posted, I did however point out he clearly has permission to put it on his blog being he used the provided Embed link which is for the express purpose of embeding the Video in websites other than Youtube and by anyone that is able to do so.
Between THIS poster and HIS blog and THIS material no restrictions exist.
Are YOU awake now?
I don't mind going to you-tube, I don't want to go to a potentially dicey blog run by a person using Rush's name without permission.
Are YOU awake now?
Yes as I stated in the post and you so conviuenitently left out. However Blogs are copyrighted when they are produced even if they only repeat information. Whehter it is an enforceablke Copyright is another matter.
So sez the Coyright Act of 1978.
OK, then I think I can help you with that.
When you take your mouse in hand and hover the pointer over the link to his blog instead of clicking, don't click and all should be good for you.
Try it next time and get back to us on how it worked out for you.
Actually after I further parsed your statement the exact opposite is true.
Being he is reprinting copyrighted material he is supposed to excerpt via Copyright rules.
Fine.
Let’s save ourselves twenty paragraphs in the future.
You are a supporter of shameless dishonest blogpimps and I am not.
That should summarize things nicely.
Can you prove your assertion without relying on inductive reasoning?
Disprove my assertion using any reasoning you prefer.
So you are fine with him pimping at FR's expense.
Try it next time and get back to us on how it worked out for you.
Exactly what I do. I'm glad you were able to figure out the obvious.
Ahh but tis the prosecution that must first present its case and so far your case is 'Cuz I sez so".
You will have to do better than that.
But I will give you a head start, Please provide a quote from this thread where I am shown to be a "supporter of shameless dishonest blogpimps".
It doesn't matter whether I am fine with it or not what matters is the owner of Free Republic has set up a system to allow people to "Pimp their blogs" as you call it.
Of course I call it adding to the discourse of Conservative thought and spreading Conservatism via the Internet.
You may take issue with HOW he goes about it but the fact is Free Republic has a section devoted solely to Bloggers and Personal. If you don't believe me then look to either the top right or the bottom right of the screen in this thread and notice the heading Bloggers & Personal.
So if you have issues with "Blog Pimping" then maybe you should discuss it with Mr. Robinson.
(For the record I like the fact that Free Republic allows threads from Blogs I've read some very interesting stuff because Free Republic allows such.)
Side note: I find it ironic that Free Republic ha a section for "Bloggers and Personal" but the spell check will not recognize the words Blog, Blogs, or Blogger(s). ;-)
Ok, here you go:
I like the fact that Free Republic allows threads from Blogs I've read some very interesting stuff because Free Republic allows such
That was easy.
I have seen people like blogpimps all my life in church, clubs and other organizations. They are all shameless and classless self promoters who don’t necessarily sufficiently break the rules for a benevolent organization to boot them but the members don’t have to except them either.
Act like a douche bag and expect to be treated like one. Blogpimps who plagiarize and “borrow” material should be treated like the garbage they are.
We have had bloggers here who write their own material and post the entire thing here not excerpting with a link to their blog. If they are good, and few ever are, one searches for additional material from them. These are not blogpimps they are real FReepers like Jeff Head.
The blogpimps sure ain’t Jeff Head. The blogpimps know who they are and yes I am calling them garbage.
The prosecution simply has to make the case beyond a reasonable doubt and beyond a reasonable doubt I am convinced you are here supporting blogpimps.
If humblegunner is the prosecution then he can rest.
Ahh so we start with inductive reasoning then eh A.K.A. Blogpimps use blogs so all bloggers are blogpimps.
Brilliant stuff.
So then Jeff Head is a blog pimper by your reasoning? As well as the American Thinker and Michelle Malkin?
Read post 58.
There, NOW can you read it?
To break it down for you:
Bloggers post the entire screed without a link to their blog one MUST go to to complete reading.
Blogpimps excerpt and one must go to their blog to finish. Also they have usually "borrowed" the material anyway.
Clear now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.