There, NOW can you read it?
To break it down for you:
Bloggers post the entire screed without a link to their blog one MUST go to to complete reading.
Blogpimps excerpt and one must go to their blog to finish. Also they have usually "borrowed" the material anyway.
Clear now?
Ahh but you have missed the point entirely (and not surprising being you to are engaging in inductive reasoning) Allow me to point out the most delicious part.
You Posted: "The prosecution simply has to make the case beyond a reasonable doubt and beyond a reasonable doubt I am convinced you are here supporting blogpimps."
"If humblegunner is the prosecution then he can rest."
Here is Humblegunners Case:
He used my posting of:
"I like the fact that Free Republic allows threads from Blogs I've read some very interesting stuff because Free Republic allows such."
Now being you have told me that you like reading Jeff Head's stuff which is by your own admission a blog then you to are guilty of Blog Pimping being that you have claimed Humble gunner can rest his case.
Hahahah that is so sweetly delicious.
Further your reasoning that "Bloggers post the entire screed without a link to their blog one MUST go to to complete reading." (Which I might point out is "inductive" in nature.) would mean most of the professional journalists who blog are then guilty of Blog Pimping (Not to mention ALL of the Newspapers)
But what really is the case is they are taking advantage of their Copyrights guaranteed to them by the Copyright act.
Why would you deny them this?