Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Full article at link
1 posted on 04/23/2010 7:11:30 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: opentalk

If that’s true, we’ll get to the bottom of this.

At some point, it starts to look very silly for a
candidate not to be forthright and instead spend
a fortune avoiding being forthright.

thanks for posting.


2 posted on 04/23/2010 7:16:17 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

Dana Perino an Obama voter? Source?


3 posted on 04/23/2010 7:17:38 AM PDT by PalmettoMason (The shattered skulls of tyrants should be used for traction under the boots of justice. T. Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

the temporary usurper...he and his, everything must be done now, soon, quickly....as his sad @$$ is on the way out—one way or t’other—but unfortunately, not now, quickly nor soon enough for good men and women...


5 posted on 04/23/2010 7:22:54 AM PDT by gunnyg (THINK: NOVEMBER TOO LATE???/!!! Our Novembers Are Behind Us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

It seems that the talking heads don’t want to confront the issue because if they find out it’s true, they know there will be riots.


7 posted on 04/23/2010 7:52:27 AM PDT by ebshumidors (Marksmanship and YOUR heritage http://www.appleseedinfo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

All Arizona’s law would require is that a candidate show evidence of eligibility. If the Secretary of State (I think) rejects it, then you would have a court case for the Supreme Court. Until then, everything would go as normal.

If Obama presented a birth certificate from Hawaii, odds are VERY good he would be certified for the ballot by Arizona.

To put teeth into this law, Arizona would have to pass a law stating that no one could run for President unless both parents were US citizens. THAT would be a rejection of Obama, and require one hell of a legal fight...but don’t hold your breath.


8 posted on 04/23/2010 8:00:08 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

It appears precedent has already been established regarding removing unqualified candidates from the ballot: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=90256


13 posted on 04/23/2010 8:52:41 AM PDT by persistence48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

Other states are doing this too. Why all the focus on AZ?


16 posted on 04/23/2010 9:23:09 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk
Law should require anyone running for public office to have proof of citizenship especially someone running for president.
18 posted on 04/24/2010 7:17:04 AM PDT by yoe (The "N" word stands for NO...as in NO MORE VOTES FOR IRRESPONSIBLE CONGRESSMEN OR SENATORS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: opentalk

Quote the text from the constitution, with proper indexing please.

Without that this is spam.


19 posted on 01/27/2012 7:55:21 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson