To: Man50D
but confirms the point I made that during the 2008 campaign that Palin must acquiesce to McAmnesty’s socialist tendencies as all Vice Presidents must relent to their bosses point of view. She knew the consequences going in as his VP and she still accepted Groan!
Not the same old anti-Palin rubbish again!
Tell me something, did you follow the 1980 GOP primaries between Reagan and Bush Snr at all, before Bush became Reagan's VP candidate that is?
To: SmokingJoe
Not the same old anti-Palin rubbish again!
Tell me something, did you follow the 1980 GOP primaries between Reagan and Bush Snr at all, before Bush became Reagan's VP candidate that is?
Rubbish? That's a new label to minimize her amnesty position. Good one! Now you want you turn the clock back 30 years to avoid discussing Palin? Why not revert back to the Lincoln-Douglas debates? Every time I think I've seen the depth of desperation of Palin supporters you prove me wrong.
239 posted on
04/17/2010 11:15:58 AM PDT by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson