Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: urtax$@work
It is the normal response of a liar to overly explain why, how, and why not. A good liar finds a believable succint reason and sticks with just that - simple, clean, concise....

The judge is a bought-off crook, period. I don't care who or why he/she was put where they are, or by whom. Crook, period...

12 posted on 04/16/2010 12:36:50 PM PDT by Gaffer ("Profling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
It is the normal response of a liar to overly explain why, how, and why not. A good liar finds a believable succint reason and sticks with just that - simple, clean, concise....

No, a competent judge cites the applicable law, precedents and rules.

Incompetent attorneys such as Taitz ignore all that, in favor of wild, generalized accusations with no basis in fact.

15 posted on 04/16/2010 12:46:17 PM PDT by browardchad ("Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own fact." - Daniel P Moynihan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer
The judge is a bought-off crook, period.

Lamberth was one of the toughest judges against Clinton's wrongdoing. You might want to not just knee-jerk an attack against him, given Taitz's poor history in courtrooms.

21 posted on 04/16/2010 12:58:33 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer; urtax$@work; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; ...
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Orly v Obama – Dismissed

"i was gonna post something from the ruling, but Lamberth wrote SOOOO MUCH .....like a pagagraph list of reasons of why the case was dismissed.

"10 posted on Friday, April 16, 2010 1:31:21 PM by urtax$@work"

"To: urtax$@work

"It is the normal response of a liar to overly explain why, how, and why not. A good liar finds a believable succint reason and sticks with just that - simple, clean, concise....

"The judge is a bought-off crook, period. I don't care who or why he/she was put where they are, or by whom. Crook, period..."

"12 posted on Friday, April 16, 2010 1:36:50 PM by Gaffer ("Profling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!") "

23 posted on 04/16/2010 1:02:54 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

It is the normal response of a liar to overly explain why, how, and why not. A good liar finds a believable succint reason and sticks with just that - simple, clean, concise....
The judge is a bought-off crook, period. I don’t care who or why he/she was put where they are, or by whom. Crook, period...


You can call one of the most respected conservative judges in the nation all names you want but the fact remains that this is the 61st. Obama eligibility lawsuit to be dismissed by judges and justices at every level of the judiciary and in pratically every jurisdiction in the nation.
The “crooks” on the US Supreme Court have denied seven Obama eligibility lawsuits even with a conservative majority and it only takes 4 of the 9 Justices to agree to hear a case.

“The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.”—Einstein
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY LAWSUITS

Allen v. Soetoro
Freedom Of Information Act Arizona District: Filed

Ankeny v. Daniels (and McCain) Indiana State: Dismissed
Indiana Supreme Court: Denied

Barnett v Obama, California Central District: Dismissed
formerly Keyes v Obama et al, 9th US Court of Appeals: Pending

Berg v. Obama et. al. Fed PA Eastern: Dismissed
3rd Circuit Appeals Appealed Brief FEC
Hearing 26-Oct-2009
Supreme Court Of The United States: Denied

Berg v. Obama Fed DC District: Dismissed

Beverly v FEC, US Court of Appeals 9th Circuit: Dismissed
US Supreme Court: Denied

Brockhausen v. Andrade, Texas State: Dismissed

Broe v. Reed Washington State Supreme: Dismissed

The Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri et al v. Obama et. al.
Dismissed

Cohen v. Obama, DC: Dismissed

Connerat v. Browning, Florida Supreme Court : Dismissed
Connerat v. Obama FL Small Claims: Dismissed

Constitution Party v. Lingle, Hawaii Supreme Court: Dismissed
Reconsideration: Denied

Cook v. Good et al GA Middle: Dismissed

Cook v. Simtech FL Middle: Dismissed

Craig v. US: Judgment in favor of defendant
Dismissal Affirmed
U.S. Supreme Court: Writ Denied 29-Sep-2009

Dawson v. Obama California Eastern District: Dismissed

Donofrio v Wells: NJ State Dismissed
NJ Supreme Court Denied
Supreme Court Of The United States: Denied

Ealey v. Obama TX Houston: Dismissed

Essek v. Obama KY Eastern: Dismissed

Gopalan v Obama III et. al., CA Southern: Dismissed

Greenberg v. Brunner, Ohio Wood County Court: Dismissed

Hamblin v Obama/McCain Arizona District: Dismissed

Herbert v. Obama et al Fed FL Middle: Dismissed

Hollister v. Soetoro, Fed DC: Dismissed

Hunter v. Obama, US District Northern Texas : Dismissed

Jones v. Obama, Federal Court Cal. Central District: Pending

Judy v. McCain, US District Court Nevada North: Dismissed

Kerchner et al v. Obama et al., Federal District Court New Jersey: Dismissed
US Court of Appeals 10th District: Pending

Keyes v. Bowen Superior Court of CA: Dismissed

Keyes v. Lingle, Hawaii state: Dismissed

Lightfoot v. Bowen , Supreme Court Of The United States: Denied

Marquis v. Reed, Washington State Court, King County Superior: Dismissed

Martin v Lingle, HI State: Dismissed
HI State Appeal: Dismissed

Meroni et al v. McHenry County Grand Jury Foreman et al. , Illinois State: Denied

Morrow v. Barak Humane Obama Fed FL Miami: Dismissed

Neal v. Brunner, Ohio State Wood County: Dismissed

Neely v. Obama, Fed MI: Dismissed

Patriot Heart’s Network v Soetoro, DC Federal: Denied

Rhodes v. Gates TX West: Denied

Rhodes v. MacDonald GA Middle: Dismissed, Denied Rehearing, Sanctions Imposed

Roy v. Obama Fed HI: Dismissed

Schneller v. Cortes
PA Supreme Court: Denied
Supreme Court of the United States: Dismissed

Spuck v. Secretary of State, Ohio State, Erie County: Dismissed

Stamper v. US: Dismissed

Stumpo v. Granholm, MI State Court 30th Dist. Court (Ingham County): Dismissed

Strunk Fed NY Eastern: Dismissed
Strunk 2nd Circuit: Denied
Strunk v U.S. Department of State
FOIA Fed District of Columbia
DC Circuit Appealed

Sullivan v. Marshall, North Carolina Superior Court: Dismissed

Taitz v Obama, US District DC: Dismissed

Thomas v. Hosemann Fed Dist Hawaii: Dismissed

Terry v. Handel, Georgia State Court Fulton County: Denied

Welch v. Mukasey et al NY Northern District: Dismissed

Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz CT State: Dismissed
Supreme Court Of The United States: Denied


38 posted on 04/16/2010 3:15:00 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer
The judge is a bought-off crook, period. I don't care who or why he/she was put where they are, or by whom. Crook, period...

Funny...I sure remember how much we were fans of his during the Clinton years when he was letting some of those lawsuits go forward. Maybe the problem is not with the judge.

47 posted on 04/16/2010 3:36:58 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

Any competent judge would have likewise sent Orly packing. She’s loony tunes.


118 posted on 04/18/2010 10:41:36 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson