I understand she owes that traitor her support for his re-election campaign. Fine. But she could simply just support him.
But what words has she chosen to express that support? Have you heard them? Do you know what she’s saying about him? They are all lies. Everything she says about McCain is a bald-faced and inexcusable lie.
As for me, I wish her well (sincerely) in her new career as political pundit and Fox News commentator. I think she’ll be very effective and I think she’ll put her shoulder to the wheel and help elect many good people to office, not just that traitor she’s whole-heartedly supporting in AZ.
I’m sorry but I was hating John McCain long before I ever even knew anything about Sarah Palin. In my view she has undercut her credibility too much to be a serious contender.
That doesn’t mean she can’t be a serious voice. She is. That’s why Barry is taking her seriously. But to think of her working her butt of to put That Traitor back in the Senate (where he will immediately proceed to stab us all in the back for the next 6 years)... well, President Palin? I think not.
President Palin is becoming a distinct possibility. Her political instincts are amazing to behold. She made it terribly difficult to pass the Obamacare bill and she forced the Prez to make some extremely seedy deals to get the votes that he needed. A simple mention of “Death Panels” and the damage was done.
Her comments on the nuclear doctrine have put Obama and Hillary on the defensive, backtrackiung and back filling and trying to repair the damage done to them. One comment did that damage.
This administration has been made to look foolish both by their actions and Sarah’s calling attention to the silliness of the doctrine. Not bad.
As far as “foreign policy experience” she, like most all Presidential hopefuls, has none. The last Prez who did have terrific creds in this area was Ike Eisenhower. that is why wer have a State Department that is so large.
She is doing a great job of running for the Presidency and I believe that she will win it in 2012.
As far as your need for ideological purity, it’s not realistic. Never was.