Got to love the “retard-in-chief”
A lot of foolish people failed to understand he is trying to destroy the country. A few military people here were saying how stupid the LTC doctor was to stand up to him. People have no clue what is going on. They care more about NCAA ball games and other inane BS that is meaningless.
It’s a fine nuance, but MAD was not just an insane revenge on the world, as our alternative to just “accepting getting nuked” as the writer implied.
The whole concept is precisely the opposite. It is that no nation will ever throw those nukes in the first place. Everyone knows that a launch on the USA, is actually basically launching on theirself. Pointless,, impossible to prevail.
And yes, this includes the “suicidal” muslims, North Koreans, etc. Iran wants a bomb so what happened to Saddam won’t happen to him. Israel is his excuse,,, but after the Iranians get their nuke, there will always be some reason why *today* isn’t the day they nuke Tel Aviv. If Kim Jong il was so “crazy and suicidal”, then why not launch a war against the south this afternoon? Nukes in hands of guys like these make them nearly impossible to invade and depose. (for the Obama justice department,,,”depose” as in overthrow,,not get interviewd by justice dept attorneys for prosecution)
The reason, is MAD. And theres a big difference between sending a few retards out with suicide belts,, and them ready to see Tehran and Mecca vaporized.
MAD is a lousy acronym, for a wise and effective policy. For the first time in world history, invasions are impossible against nations properly armed. No nuclear nation has been invaded or bombed that i know of since WWII.
As an example,, Russia was invaded by Germans, French or British every 25 years or so since 1800. Millions dead each time. Europe wouldnt dare now, and thats the main point.
Same for USA except we have always been protected by oceans, The only way to attack us was through an Obama.
obama is nothing less than a foreign enemy. Someone like him was always the only way to successfully attack America.
Doesnt any treay he signs giving up our nuclear deterrent have to be ratified by the Senate?
Can the Senate raitfy this without going Nuclear like they did with the health plan?
Unfortunately, Obama has not followed the Reagan model of keeping the deterrent while developing a relatively benign defensive alternative. Rather, Obama has thrown in the cards not only on MAD but on its only reasonable, viable alternative as well. It is this double default on the Nation's security that reveals his treasonous intentions-- and demands his removal from office asap.
I don’t believe the President has ever read Sun Tsu