Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

Silly goose! The law does not say, jamese777 gets to substitute his reason for believing BO is a NBC; the law requires that when citizens asked Boyd Richie on what basis he Certified BO was a NBC; he had 10 (ten) days to respond with that information. Besides, WH Counsel Bob Bauer, then Counsel to OFA and the DNC Services Corporation, thought the best evidence BO was a NBC was his - BO’s - word to federal Judge Robertson, he - BO - had publicly produced his Hawaiian birth certificate. I seldom question anyone’s motives but, in this case, I must assume you are joking by suggesting we accept your proffer of ‘evidence’ as to BO’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS, that is, an affidavit from HI DoH officials; but reject the evidence proffered to the federal court by WH Counsel Bob Bauer, on behalf of his client, Defendant BO.


36 posted on 04/08/2010 12:09:55 PM PDT by jbjd (http://jbjd.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: jbjd

Silly goose! The law does not say, jamese777 gets to substitute his reason for believing BO is a NBC; the law requires that when citizens asked Boyd Richie on what basis he Certified BO was a NBC; he had 10 (ten) days to respond with that information. Besides, WH Counsel Bob Bauer, then Counsel to OFA and the DNC Services Corporation, thought the best evidence BO was a NBC was his - BO’s - word to federal Judge Robertson, he - BO - had publicly produced his Hawaiian birth certificate. I seldom question anyone’s motives but, in this case, I must assume you are joking by suggesting we accept your proffer of ‘evidence’ as to BO’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS, that is, an affidavit from HI DoH officials; but reject the evidence proffered to the federal court by WH Counsel Bob Bauer, on behalf of his client, Defendant BO.


Hey, you go right ahead. Have fun going after Boyd Ritchie. Enjoy!
And no, I have no need whatsoever for you to accept the state of Hawaii’s “proffer of evidence” which I referenced. Judges and justices across the nation will continue to define what “evidence” is real and what “evidence” is irrelevant just as they have for the past two years. They are the ones who ultimately matter, not you or me. So proffer away!


38 posted on 04/08/2010 1:06:01 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson