Silly goose! The law does not say, jamese777 gets to substitute his reason for believing BO is a NBC; the law requires that when citizens asked Boyd Richie on what basis he Certified BO was a NBC; he had 10 (ten) days to respond with that information. Besides, WH Counsel Bob Bauer, then Counsel to OFA and the DNC Services Corporation, thought the best evidence BO was a NBC was his - BO’s - word to federal Judge Robertson, he - BO - had publicly produced his Hawaiian birth certificate. I seldom question anyone’s motives but, in this case, I must assume you are joking by suggesting we accept your proffer of ‘evidence’ as to BO’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS, that is, an affidavit from HI DoH officials; but reject the evidence proffered to the federal court by WH Counsel Bob Bauer, on behalf of his client, Defendant BO.
Ah, jamese777, so off put by logic, you can no longer see straight. I am not going after Boyd Richie in court - by the way, no “t” in Richie - nor am I advising other citizens to do this. Ha, this would be ridiculous because 1) I am not a citizen of Texas; and 2) this law that underlies such a suit only applies to Chairs of political parties (and certain candidates for office). Get it? Rather, I am merely pointing out, if the RPT had wanted to remove Mr. Obama’s name from the ballot in 2008, under Texas law, they had standing in state court to do just that. And they knew how to do it because the TDP had done this to them. Or, they can file suit now to keep BO’s name off the 2012 ballot! You sound angry because I rejected your proffer of proof outright inasmuch as your ‘advice’ was contradicted by WH Counsel Bob Bauer.
I know this. The best piece of evidence Bob Bauer had in January 2009 to establish his client, Barack Obama, was a NBC; was the Certification of his Nomination signed by Nancy Pelosi, Chair of the 2008 DNC Convention, swearing he was Constitutionally eligible for the job, meaning, he is a NBC, delivered to election officials in HI to get his name printed on the ballot. Because every other item proffered by Mr. Bauer at best could only establish, his client was a “native.” (Note, Mr. Bauer only offered his client’s word such a HI birth document existed; he failed to submit such document to the court. LOL.) So, here was the choice: give the court your word your client produced a piece of paper showing he was born in HI; or produce the Certification of Nomination signed by the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, 3rd in line of Presidential succession, with all of the gravitas that entails, swearing he is Constitutionally eligible for the job, and which Certification was used to get his name on the ballot in states whose laws only allowed the names of eligible candidates to be printed on the ballot. And Mr. Bauer withheld Ms. Pelosi’s Certification. Know why? Because he could not get one client - BO - out of a civil mess by producing a document that would expose another client - NP - to criminal liability.
Maybe that’s why NP (and DNC Secretary Alice Germond, who co-signed those Certifications) refused to respond to citizen requests for the documentary basis for those Certifications; except to say, the DNC is not a public agency and therefore, they do not have to provide this documentation.
But this ‘get out of jail free’ card does not work in Texas. Yee Haw!