Boyd Richie submitted a document to election officials swearing BO was eligible. Pursuant to requests under the Texas Open Records law, he had a duty to substantiate why. He deliberately did not. Under Texas law, this means, he lied when he swore BO was eligible.
Under Texas law, only the names of eligible candidates may appear on the ballot. Boyd Richie swore BO was eligible but no documentary evidence in the public record could establish such eligibility. Citizens submitted requests under the Texas Open Records law so as to obtain the documents used by the TDP in their Certification. They ignored these requests. Citizens reported to the AG, the crime of election fraud has been committed in our state. Investigate.
Your rationale as to BO’s eligibility has absolutely nothing to do with these facts. (Besides, whatever basis is used for eligibility must have existed BEFORE Mr. Richie swore to the eligibility on August 27, 2008.)
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
Since the state of Hawaii has verified Obama’s birth records it doesn’t seem likely to me that Mr. Ritchie will have any problems with the law in Texas.
Mr. Ritchie’s answer to the question is “a copy of the Barack Hussein Obama II’s Certification of Live Birth issued by the state of Hawaii.”
You keep making a mistaken assumption. Fukino’s statement doesn’t verify any birth records ... unless she produces these records and shows that they are indeed birth records. She might be referring to political affadavits, correspondence to her office, e-mail or even newspaper articles. There’s no evidence she’s referring to a birth record in support of her undocumented claim that she saw records verifying Obama was born in Hawaii. We do know she was not referencing the original birth certificate.
Silly goose! The law does not say, jamese777 gets to substitute his reason for believing BO is a NBC; the law requires that when citizens asked Boyd Richie on what basis he Certified BO was a NBC; he had 10 (ten) days to respond with that information. Besides, WH Counsel Bob Bauer, then Counsel to OFA and the DNC Services Corporation, thought the best evidence BO was a NBC was his - BO’s - word to federal Judge Robertson, he - BO - had publicly produced his Hawaiian birth certificate. I seldom question anyone’s motives but, in this case, I must assume you are joking by suggesting we accept your proffer of ‘evidence’ as to BO’s Constitutional eligibility for POTUS, that is, an affidavit from HI DoH officials; but reject the evidence proffered to the federal court by WH Counsel Bob Bauer, on behalf of his client, Defendant BO.