[onyx]

After further snooping, I have changed my mind....LOL. I have located too many instances of keywords, which are always "give away" words.

To be fair,.......... this guy isn’t an “Obama guy,” he’s a career regulator - 22 years at FDIC, the past 4 as deputy COO of OTS. This is more a question of “another crook in DC” than it is a partisan matter.

To be fair,.......... President Bush did use a list of reporters at some of his press conferences as well.

To be fair,............ Obama was writing in response to a letter Chirac sent to Obama

To be fair,.........that room service story was fake - she wasn't even staying at the hotel where it supposedly took place.

To be fair, ..............Bush did replace all (or most) of the US Attorneys when he took office in 2001

THERE ARE SEVERAL MORE EXAMPLES, BUT I THINK YOU GET MY POINT.

What say you,CONSCIENCE OF A CONSERVATIVE?

[Conscience of a Conservative]

What do I have to say in response to that? Well, I’ve already said (in this thread) that I think the most effective criticism of Obama and the ‘rats is criticism that is based in FACTS, and criticism that is ACCURATE. There is nothing wrong (or troll-like) in looking for accuracy, pointing out where statements are inaccurate, or using the phrase “to be fair.”

If you want to call me a troll, then please look at the list of quotes you just pulled from my posts, and tell me where I was wrong/inaccurate in my posts. Inserting facts into a discussion is not “trolling.”

[Conscience of a Conservative]

What do I have to say in response to that? Well, I’ve already said (in this thread) that I think the most effective criticism of Obama and the ‘rats is criticism that is based in FACTS, and criticism that is ACCURATE. There is nothing wrong (or troll-like) in looking for accuracy, pointing out where statements are inaccurate, or using the phrase “to be fair.”

If you want to call me a troll, then please look at the list of quotes you just pulled from my posts, and tell me where I was wrong/inaccurate in my posts. Inserting facts into a discussion is not “trolling.”