[Conscience of a Conservative]

What do I have to say in response to that? Well, I’ve already said (in this thread) that I think the most effective criticism of Obama and the ‘rats is criticism that is based in FACTS, and criticism that is ACCURATE. There is nothing wrong (or troll-like) in looking for accuracy, pointing out where statements are inaccurate, or using the phrase “to be fair.”

If you want to call me a troll, then please look at the list of quotes you just pulled from my posts, and tell me where I was wrong/inaccurate in my posts. Inserting facts into a discussion is not “trolling.”

[onyx]

Actually, I think you're sincere, but I suspect that you might be prone to nitpick detail and put such a fine point on your posts as to make your comments appear like you're taking the other side, even when you're not. I have my own definition of "troll' - nasty, foul mouthed - so obviously you do not fit mine.

I stopped looking at your older posts here, wherein you took up for Obama. *sigh*

The thought's crossed my mind that perhaps you're a lawyer, which would explain your interest in some of the subjects you've addressed and also your penchant for detail.