Your Post #17 is not a test.
It is an examination of something that exists today and trying to figure out what happened in the past.
You want absurdity?
Hemoglobin is made up of 287 Amino Acids that must be in sequence. There are 20 Amino Acids used in building life. The odds of Hemoglobin randomly assembling (randomly.... no intelligence) is 1/20 X 1/20 X 1/20, etc. The odds of getting hemoglobin end up being 1 X 2.5^373.... I’m sure you know that there are 373 zeros in that number. Just as a point of reference, Science estimates that the number of atoms in the known universe is 10^80.
Hemoglobin is one protein. Science argues about the number of proteins in the human body but on the low side of the estimates it is claimed to be 10,000. Hemoglobin is only one of those. What you saw above has to occur at least 9,999 more times.
While I’m thinking of it, here’s a few more questions for you:
1. How exactly did we get from organisms that reproduce asexually to those that produce sexually.....and then to just happen to have two different sets of plumbing evolve all at the same time to make it possible?
2. Which came first, blood or veins....or arteries.... or the heart? If the heart came first what did it pump? If the veins came first, how did the blood know (when it came along) that it was supposed to go inside the veins? Wait, it had to go through the heart first....how does it know that? Did the blood already have coagulating properties? How did it know not to coagulate while still inside the body?
3. Wendy referred to fruit flies in one of her posts. Everything I’ve ever read about these experiments is that no matter how many they radiate and no matter how many generations they go they wind up with one of three things: fruit flies, damaged fruit flies and dead fruit flies. Do you have an explanation for that?
4. We are told by science that macroevolution occurs via Natural Selection and Mutations. By definition, Natural Selection can only select out traits that already exist and there has never been a mutation that has ever been observed that increased genetic information....all have been information-neutral or lost information.
For evolution to be true then, since there hasn’t been a mechanism found that increases genetic information, I can logically infer that every trait of every living organism, bacteria, plant, animal or human had to have been in that first gene that popped out of the primordial mud puddle 4.5 Billion (or whatever number they are using now) years ago. What do you think the odds are of that?
I’ll close by saying something that I said in an earlier post. An epithet is not an argument. If you can’t make your point respectfully without insulting someone I can only assume that you are incapable of it.
brilliant read and the close was honorable as well.....got a question for you now..........why is 3/ 4’s of the earth covered in salt water
You cannot refute the genetic test I cited. It proves conclusively that humans and chimps have a common ancestor. All of your other questions must be answered in light of that.