[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

Involves randomness is which genes combine yes. But it is NOT a random process, and every single time anybody tries to attack evolution with the word “random” all they prove is they don’t know what they’re talking about.

Then you reject neo Darwinism? Last time I checked that was the reigning paradigm. Chance followed by natural selection ...no?

Once selected via "natural selection" from random mutations then the life form maintains itself for a time. But eventually, both individually and as a species succumbs to the inexorable ravages of the second law.

[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

click image in post #38

[discostu]

What I reject is the false choice you present. Chance in which genes combine does NOT make a random system and does NOT make random mutation. Every single time a creationist throws the “random mutation” phrase out there they lie.