Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBO Snafu: Social Security to Start Bleeding in 2010
Axis of Right ^ | 3/25/2010 | Ryan

Posted on 03/25/2010 6:07:53 PM PDT by SalAOR

In the same week that the largest new entitlement program in 45 years just became law, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has issued numbers indicating that Social Security is going to pay-out more than it takes in not in 2016 as projected but in 2010! The official “day of reckoning” has been moved from 2041 to 2037. However, according to experts we are “not to expect the date to lurch forward again.” Ha! That, and I can sell you that big bridge in Brooklyn for just a few apples!

Why did this happen? The reason is simple: the recession means less jobs, and therefore less tax revenue coming into the system.

(Excerpt) Read more at axisofright.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics
KEYWORDS: cbo; moronaccountants; printingmoney; socialsecurity; theft

1 posted on 03/25/2010 6:07:54 PM PDT by SalAOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SalAOR

“Why did this happen? The reason is simple: the recession means less jobs, and therefore less tax revenue coming into the system.”

So they missed by SIX YEARS?

Well, then...the CBO numbers for the next 20 years are pretty much...uh...a “big f*****g deal....right Mr. Biden?


2 posted on 03/25/2010 6:10:30 PM PDT by jessduntno (B. Hussein Obama...I look at him and think, in the words of Biden, "Big F***ing deal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SalAOR

Don’t worry. This is why those death panels were put into place.


3 posted on 03/25/2010 6:11:12 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SalAOR
Isn't that convenient. So broke now, after the huge over 2 trillion health care fiasco passes. Yeah, right on.
4 posted on 03/25/2010 6:12:00 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Ok, who tried to reform SS??? Maybe someone knew something?????


5 posted on 03/25/2010 6:12:25 PM PDT by KevinDavis (No money for the moon, but money for High Speed Choo Choo's....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SalAOR

Good ole’ garbage in, garbage out CBO.......who would have thunk (yes, I spelled it wrong purposely)........


6 posted on 03/25/2010 6:13:56 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SalAOR
Just think the same government that can't manage social security, medicare/Medicaid, AMTRACK, The Post Office, and illegal Immigration...

Now has taken over our Health Care, and promise it will not bust the budget. They can't manage crap, but now they can manage our Health Care??

7 posted on 03/25/2010 6:28:33 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SalAOR

Are these the same green eyeshade-wearing moron government bean counters who said ObamaCare was only going to cost 940 billion? ROTFL!!! Those guys are a hoot! They are clueless when it comes to math.


8 posted on 03/25/2010 6:37:14 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ('...the first day of spring...otherwise known to Al Gore as proof of global warming'. - Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SalAOR
Why did this happen? The reason is simple: the recession means less jobs, and therefore less tax revenue coming into the system.

No, Ryan. This happened for the simple reason that Congress spent the money it was supposed to have saved for Social Security. I suppose we should take heart in the fact that they wrote IOUs for it.

9 posted on 03/25/2010 6:40:43 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SalAOR

Paul Ryan just showed a chart of the money they are usurping to pay for this health care debacle and it included $500 billion from the Medicare Trust and several billion from the Social Security Trust...wait...wait...wait...is that why Social Security is going to start bleeding out in 2010?


10 posted on 03/25/2010 6:42:58 PM PDT by RowdyFFC (The opinion of a wise Welshtino woman...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SalAOR

bump


11 posted on 03/25/2010 7:06:04 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Why did this happen? The reason is simple: the recession means less jobs, and therefore less tax revenue coming into the system.

No, Ryan. This happened for the simple reason that Congress spent the money it was supposed to have saved for Social Security.

Read carefully, this is now the year that SS starts paying out more than it takes in. That means that those IOUs will start to need to be called in. But as you know there is not money in a lock box, so the money will have to come from the general fund. Oops, while it's not broke, it's paying out over a trillion a year more than it's taking in. So more borrowing, or cutbacks in SS, including even later retirement than is already on the books.

Of course folks over 55 or so, maybe less, who get laid off in the current Obama economy will be unlikely to find new jobs, maybe ever. That may mean that people who would have waited for "full" SS retirement, may retire early, meaning even more demand on current SS payments.

But under Obamacare, they will only get pallitive treatment, if it's not too expensive, and so they won't be around very long. That will decrease the demands on the SS account, which is probably the whole point of healthcare. Get rid of those aging beatniks and hippies, yippies and yuppies.

12 posted on 03/25/2010 11:07:33 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

I meant to add that Congress spending the surplus in the SS account had nothing to do with it now having to pay out more than it takes in. But that spending means there is no money to make up the difference, except by borrowing, or cutting military spending, NASA, DOE and maybe highways. Everything else is “untouchable”, even if theoretically “discretionary”. Of course this big health care mess is not discretionary, and will cost a lot more than predicted.


13 posted on 03/25/2010 11:23:01 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson