Posted on 03/24/2010 3:27:31 AM PDT by jbjd
Attorney General Abbott has indicated he will file a civil suit to challenge the Constitutionality of the just signed Mandatory Purchase of Private Health Insurance bill, arguing it encroaches on states rights by violating the Commerce Clause. But for several months now, he has had at his disposal a tool that is both much quicker and cheaper to combat this law, as well as any other legislation originating up Mr. Obamas sinister sleeve. That is, he could investigate the dozens of charges of election fraud the citizens of the great state of Texas have already filed with his office....
(Excerpt) Read more at jbjd.wordpress.com ...

Correction: I misread the phrase being written by Gregg Abbott and not the AG but the issue of the documents still remains.
Not holding my breath about the Traitors in Congress doing anything about his eligibility.
No; this is the wrong document. As anyone getting this election fraud information firsthand from my blog knows, in Texas, only Boyd Richie, Chair of the Texas Democratic Party, submitted the required Certifications of Nomination. (Please read the accompanying citizen complaint of election fraud against Boyd Richie and request for investigation by Attorney General Abbott, which complaint citizens of Texas have been downloading and filing since October 2009. Mr. Richie’s documents are linked.) For this reason, that is, the Certifications were handled differently in different states; before I could draft the citizen complaint of election fraud in individual states, I asked citizens in those states to contact election officials to acquire any and all documents pertaining to the candidate Certification.
In other words, I already know what documents Boyd Richie submitted in TX. Now, I want to see which documents were the basis for the facts sworn to in those documents.
Obviously, Congress has not acted before now to address these issues of Presidential eligibility. In the absence of internal motivation to do the right thing, there is no external pressure to stick their necks out to do the right thing, when citizens in applicable states cannot even get state officials to uphold existing state ballot laws! Next time the citizens of Texas want to join a march, I recommend they march to Austin, and demand that AG Abbott responds to these complaints of election fraud already filed! If citizens in Texas are unsuccessful in asserting their sovereignty over state government then...
No, you are wrong. And all of those other internet sites that stole material organized on my blog (or who only checked the documents submitted in one or two states and then mistakenly assumed all other states were the same) got it wrong. (That’s what happens when you fail to do your homework.) Learning how government works is not an overnight endeavor. And arguing with me does not alter the facts. Read the citizen complaints of election fraud posted in the sidebar of my blog. You will see, each complaint is different, depending on who submitted the Certification to election officials in that state; and who signed the Certifications. In TX, the only Certifications received by election officials came from Boyd Richie; and he alone signed these documents. (I have also written several posts about this issue. Why don’t you read them?)
You point to a distinction without a difference. State laws determine what language is required in the Certification. In a state like HI, which requires specific language of eligibility, the DNC uses the word, Constitution. In a state like SC, which requires candidates must be eligible to appear on the ballot, the state D party Treasurer hand wrote assurances of eligibility. (See the citizen complaint of election fraud for SC, in the sidebar of my blog, and follow the links therein.) In states that require candidates to be eligible for the job to have their names printed on the ballot; saying someone has been “duly nominated” by the club, when club rules require the nominee to be Constitutionally eligible for the job, is the same thing as saying, the candidate is Constitutionally qualified for the job. (All of this information is spelled out in the citizen complaints of election fraud, for the ease of the A’sG who are being asked to investigate these charges.)
Keep in mind, several R’s and some D’s voted against this bill. Are you saying, even given the ‘cover’ of such a criminal charge, none of these people has the civic mindedness to introduce Articles of Impeachment, allowing for an investigation?
It appears not.
Have you downloaded and filed a citizen complaint of election fraud? (They’re in the sidebar on the blog.) Have you downloaded the open letter to AG Abbott; or called his office to ask why he is sitting on these complaints? If you and 10,000 other citizens filed complaints; or marched on state offices in Austin, how could he ignore you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.