Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party Leader Resigns Over Rand Paul's Pal Adam Kokesh
Genuine GOP Mom ^ | March 23, 2010 | Mommy

Posted on 03/23/2010 4:05:57 PM PDT by La Enchiladita

Below is a video of Rand Paul with his pal Adam Kokesh talking about their common "movement".

Read a report at Gathering of Eagles about James Bancroft's "mighty stand for truth" as he has resigned the Hartford Tea Party over their support for Peter Schiff who is part of this Libertarian "movement" with Adam Kokesh. Please read the whole post.

There is no doubt in my mind that Ron Paul's libertarian movement is attempting to take over the Republican Party through co-opting the Tea Party movement. We've seen this here in Kentucky as a good chunk of our Tea Party leaders supported Bill Johnson, but Rand Paul's big money (77% of it coming from out of state people in this "liberty movement") gave him credibility with the media and made him able to bill himself as "the Tea Party candidate" here. It was all a hoax, of course, and now Kentucky's grassroots-selected candidate has been disenfranchised.

Across America, the story seems to be the same. Many people involved in politics for the first time in many years have no idea that the Ron Paul / Rand Paul camp is actually anti-war, hates the 14th amendment and the 17th amendment and.....believe in UFOs. Like the people in the Hartford Tea Party who would not listen to Mr. Bancroft, they are being duped with the "broadened message" of Rand Paul and other candidates in this "movement". It's like Obama all over again.

(Excerpt) Read more at genuinegopmom.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: 911truther; adamkokesh; codepink; ivaw; kentucky; kokesh; libertarians; liebertarians; medeabenjamin; paulestinians; paulfoolery; paulfoolishness; randpaul; randpaultruthfile; ronpaultruthfile; rontards; teaparty; treygrayson; youknowhesnuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-227 next last
To: La Enchiladita

Really? As a romneybot on this anti-Mitt Romney web site, I would think that you could name most of the conservatives here that speak out against the man, and many more than me, or at least more effectively than me.

Like this guy for instance.

“If there is anyone here who doesn’t understand why we cannot support a slick socialist politician like Mitt Romney, God help you, but you’re on the wrong website. We went through this with the abortionist, gay rights activist, illegal alien supporting, gun grabbing Rudy Giuliani until someone created another website call WAnkers for Rudy and they all flew the coop. Hopefully, before too much FReeper blood is shed, someone will create a WAnkers for Romney site and we can be left to fight the good fight as we see fit!
FR is not for everyone!
1 posted on Sunday, May 03, 2009 12:32:08 PM by Jim Robinson “


141 posted on 03/24/2010 3:29:59 PM PDT by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Well then, I disagree with you that association with the RLC makes all of these candidates as bad as Kokesh. I’m infinitely more upset about loser liberal Republicans like Rob Simmons and Linda McMahon, and in the face of folks like that I find the selective outrage at ‘lie-bertarians’ puzzling. But hey, to each his own.


142 posted on 03/24/2010 7:35:48 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita; MitchellC

I think it is amazing that the people who root for Schiff are endorsing the candidates who marched with all the major leftist, Marxist, America hating bunch since the 1960’s, and that they honestly believe that the political powers that are endorsing these Marxists and traitors are now the ones who are supposed to save us from RINO-ism...

Switch to Marx! He is better than a RINO!

Ron Paul has openly endorsed one of those people, Schiff was the campaign advisor for economics for Paul’s preseidential campaign in 2008, so Schiff knows these people quite well

Schiff is without excuse on this, he KNOWS who Kokesh is, and yet...yet...people who endorse Schiff deny this???

My God, what are the Paulbots smoking? We need to keep it OUT of the public!


143 posted on 03/24/2010 7:49:39 PM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Two questions, fellow buffoon:

1.) When did Forras enter the race, and why wasn’t he included in the debate a few weeks ago?

2.) When has Schiff promoted Kokesh, and by promote I mean something more than posting an article written by someone else on his website that mentions Kokesh as an aside?


144 posted on 03/24/2010 7:50:29 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

By his complete endorsement on every website sponsored by Ron Paul

I posted the links.

use your noggin

If anyone of us were connected to David Duke, and especially on over 500 websites, we would be screaming from the rooftops to have him separated from us

yet, Schiff is silent

and pray tell, since Schiff’s website has had that letter for 5 months now, where is HIS rebuttal?

He has been silent

he hung with Ron paul, he has made statement shhe is isolationist just like the Kokesh types want

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGIC_enUS220US220&q=peter+schiff+isolationist

So, Paulbot, tell me another yarn?


145 posted on 03/24/2010 7:57:20 PM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Again, for the reading-challenged: I, unlike you apparently, actually watched the debate from the other week, and Schiff is not as 'out there' on national security as Ron Paul himself is.

If Schiff were that out there, I wouldn't theoretically support him (since the extent of my 'support' for him is talking about him in a few posts from hundreds of miles away...). The problem is that he isn't with Kokesh et al on those issues as far as I can tell, despite your hysterics - nor does he have any real connection to Kokesh that I'm aware of, but feel free to enlighten me (and by that I don't mean, demand that I read through your post history again).

You sound like some of those liberals who said about George W. Bush, 'OMG his grandpappy tried to overthrow the government!'
146 posted on 03/24/2010 7:59:09 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

I’m not a Paulbot, you ignoramus.

And thanks for explaining why Forras wasn’t at the debate - oh wait, you didn’t.

Okay, so Schiff is wrong to ‘without apparent hesitation be connected with’ the Ron Paul gang. I agree that Ron Paul is pretty close to 100% wrong on foreign policy, but I don’t think it makes everyone connected to Ron Paul as much of a Code Pink d*ckhead as Kokesh.

Regarding Schiff being an isolationist, in the debate he made comments about Iran that showed he was far less of an isolationist than Ron Paul, and perhaps even Pat Buchanan.

Until I see something beyond three people on FR as the general support for Forras, I’m holding to the position that, were I a resident of CT, I would support Schiff over Simmons and McMahon, two retched liberals who I probably would not even support in the general election. If you’ve got pictures of Schiff torching Old Glory, then I’ll change my mind on that.


147 posted on 03/24/2010 8:09:16 PM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Am I Forras’s campaign manager?

How am I supposed to know why he wasn’t at the debate?

Maybe the media endorsed candidates didnt want him there?

Maybe the media refused to cover him?

I am glad you think I have so much power.

But for you to choose TREASON over REASON, you are a PAULBOT!

At least Simmons is conservative on defense, something we cant trust McMahon on at all

Since SCHIFF is an ISOLATIONIST, you go right ahead and vote for ADAM KOKESH endorsed PAULBOTS!

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=schiff+%2B+isolationist&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=


148 posted on 03/25/2010 7:46:38 AM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

You are supporting the same people that Marxists support

How does that make you feel?

GOOGLE KOKESH + SCHIFF

then read

I dare you.


149 posted on 03/25/2010 7:48:05 AM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

If Marxists are actually supporting Schiff over Blumenthal, and I don’t believe for a second that they will, but if they do then who am I to argue?

I googled Kokesh + Schiff and it got me exactly what I expected, a bunch of mentions of the two without any proof that Schiff promotes Kokesh.

Now, I ‘double dog dare you’ to go watch that debate from the other week and listen to Schiff’s position on Iran, and then come back here and try to tell me that it’s something Kokesh would support.


150 posted on 03/25/2010 9:15:27 AM PDT by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC; RaceBannon; stowaway; jjm2111; Mrs.LoneGOPinCT; underbyte; badbackman; Bigfitz; ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zo81QDSuixk

Peter Schiff repeating talking points of the lunatic left

listen yourself

He says in 2009 that Iraq is a QUAGMIRE when we already won!! He blames the war on bankers and whoever, and not a word about blaming it on terrorists!

listen yourself, Schiff repeats left wing talking points to his radio audience about the Iraq war!


151 posted on 03/25/2010 9:36:24 AM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Ive told you now 3 times, go to schiff’s own website

do an advanced google search

ad in www.schiffforsenate.com as the website, google kokesh

there is a letter endorsing both of them

google campaign for liberty
search for the videos on youtube

on each video of their atlanta rally, it is only 3 candidates they promote:
SCHIF
KOKESH
RAND PAUL

Schiff is joined at the hip with Kokesh and th eMarxists who send him money

otherwise, he would be denouncing all this

After all, YOU would denounce any association of you with David Duke, right?

Schiff has NEVER denounced his connection to Kokesh unless he is with him all the time


152 posted on 03/25/2010 9:40:03 AM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: MitchellC

Peter Schiff admits on camera that he has ZERO money investigated in American corporations or industry

http://ameriborn.com/shifty/


153 posted on 03/25/2010 9:48:09 AM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

RB -

I am a Connecticut voter.

I’ve always been concerned about Schiff’s rather laid back attitude towards this race. I wasn’t aware of any connection to Adam Kokesh until now.

However, Forras is trailing the other three, and the other two are RINOs.

I remain undecided. Help me out here

1 - The first priority is to defeat the democrat. What is the possibility of making Forras a viable candidate?
2 - I’m not sure I agree with your assessment of a danger by an analogy of Kokesh = David Duke. It is a little upsetting that they are so strongly linked, but Kokesh doesn’t rise to the level of Klansman as far as PR issues are concerned.
3 - Wouldn’t it be better to focus efforts on attacking Blumenthal? For example, there should be a strong effort to force him to challenge Obamacare. Obamacare is very unpopular in Connecticut, insurance capital of the world.


154 posted on 03/25/2010 10:07:22 AM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: kidd

I am going to help Forras get some attention, but we certainly need to get this out about Schiff

What is prolematic is Forras wont beat McMahon due to lack f name recognition, the media didnt invite him to let him get exposure!

So, we can call all the talk radio shows and announce his name and send them to his website


155 posted on 03/25/2010 10:21:37 AM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: kidd

oh, as for the Kokesh thing being weak, well, think about it

Read all the other links I provied near the end of this thread

Schiff is an isolationist like Kokesh
Schiff is against the Iraq war like Kokesh
Schiff doesnt invest in America, he invests all his money overseas, and expects us to call that patriotic??

If those dont sound like an IVAW/ANSWER/CODE PINK person, what else do we need?

Add in his hundreds of name mentions with Kokesh on the net...

QED


156 posted on 03/25/2010 10:23:46 AM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

It would be rare to find someone who is both an isolationist and a libertaian. In what regard is Schiff an isolationist? (I’m asking, not challenging you)

Schiff invests overseas...at present, that is just better investment of his own money. I don’t think that is a reflection of his patriotism (or lack of)

His Iraq position IS troubling though...


157 posted on 03/25/2010 10:39:19 AM PDT by kidd (Obama: The triumph of hope over evidence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: kidd

watch the video


158 posted on 03/25/2010 12:10:12 PM PDT by RaceBannon (RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I guess that was about the time I stopped being a $50 per month donor. This is why I am stunned that Jim Robinson would support the RLC who do not support our Military or their Mission. I know that Jim Robinson does, but why then would he support the RLC?


159 posted on 03/25/2010 1:40:32 PM PDT by usflagwaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: usflagwaver

You turned against freerepublic because it doesn’t support Mitt Romney?


160 posted on 03/25/2010 1:55:56 PM PDT by ansel12 ( If you guys can stop Palin, Romney will not have any real opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-227 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson