Posted on 03/23/2010 4:05:57 PM PDT by La Enchiladita
Really? As a romneybot on this anti-Mitt Romney web site, I would think that you could name most of the conservatives here that speak out against the man, and many more than me, or at least more effectively than me.
Like this guy for instance.
“If there is anyone here who doesn’t understand why we cannot support a slick socialist politician like Mitt Romney, God help you, but you’re on the wrong website. We went through this with the abortionist, gay rights activist, illegal alien supporting, gun grabbing Rudy Giuliani until someone created another website call WAnkers for Rudy and they all flew the coop. Hopefully, before too much FReeper blood is shed, someone will create a WAnkers for Romney site and we can be left to fight the good fight as we see fit!
FR is not for everyone!
1 posted on Sunday, May 03, 2009 12:32:08 PM by Jim Robinson “
Well then, I disagree with you that association with the RLC makes all of these candidates as bad as Kokesh. I’m infinitely more upset about loser liberal Republicans like Rob Simmons and Linda McMahon, and in the face of folks like that I find the selective outrage at ‘lie-bertarians’ puzzling. But hey, to each his own.
I think it is amazing that the people who root for Schiff are endorsing the candidates who marched with all the major leftist, Marxist, America hating bunch since the 1960’s, and that they honestly believe that the political powers that are endorsing these Marxists and traitors are now the ones who are supposed to save us from RINO-ism...
Switch to Marx! He is better than a RINO!
Ron Paul has openly endorsed one of those people, Schiff was the campaign advisor for economics for Paul’s preseidential campaign in 2008, so Schiff knows these people quite well
Schiff is without excuse on this, he KNOWS who Kokesh is, and yet...yet...people who endorse Schiff deny this???
My God, what are the Paulbots smoking? We need to keep it OUT of the public!
Two questions, fellow buffoon:
1.) When did Forras enter the race, and why wasn’t he included in the debate a few weeks ago?
2.) When has Schiff promoted Kokesh, and by promote I mean something more than posting an article written by someone else on his website that mentions Kokesh as an aside?
By his complete endorsement on every website sponsored by Ron Paul
I posted the links.
use your noggin
If anyone of us were connected to David Duke, and especially on over 500 websites, we would be screaming from the rooftops to have him separated from us
yet, Schiff is silent
and pray tell, since Schiff’s website has had that letter for 5 months now, where is HIS rebuttal?
He has been silent
he hung with Ron paul, he has made statement shhe is isolationist just like the Kokesh types want
So, Paulbot, tell me another yarn?
I’m not a Paulbot, you ignoramus.
And thanks for explaining why Forras wasn’t at the debate - oh wait, you didn’t.
Okay, so Schiff is wrong to ‘without apparent hesitation be connected with’ the Ron Paul gang. I agree that Ron Paul is pretty close to 100% wrong on foreign policy, but I don’t think it makes everyone connected to Ron Paul as much of a Code Pink d*ckhead as Kokesh.
Regarding Schiff being an isolationist, in the debate he made comments about Iran that showed he was far less of an isolationist than Ron Paul, and perhaps even Pat Buchanan.
Until I see something beyond three people on FR as the general support for Forras, I’m holding to the position that, were I a resident of CT, I would support Schiff over Simmons and McMahon, two retched liberals who I probably would not even support in the general election. If you’ve got pictures of Schiff torching Old Glory, then I’ll change my mind on that.
Am I Forras’s campaign manager?
How am I supposed to know why he wasn’t at the debate?
Maybe the media endorsed candidates didnt want him there?
Maybe the media refused to cover him?
I am glad you think I have so much power.
But for you to choose TREASON over REASON, you are a PAULBOT!
At least Simmons is conservative on defense, something we cant trust McMahon on at all
Since SCHIFF is an ISOLATIONIST, you go right ahead and vote for ADAM KOKESH endorsed PAULBOTS!
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=schiff+%2B+isolationist&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
You are supporting the same people that Marxists support
How does that make you feel?
GOOGLE KOKESH + SCHIFF
then read
I dare you.
If Marxists are actually supporting Schiff over Blumenthal, and I don’t believe for a second that they will, but if they do then who am I to argue?
I googled Kokesh + Schiff and it got me exactly what I expected, a bunch of mentions of the two without any proof that Schiff promotes Kokesh.
Now, I ‘double dog dare you’ to go watch that debate from the other week and listen to Schiff’s position on Iran, and then come back here and try to tell me that it’s something Kokesh would support.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zo81QDSuixk
Peter Schiff repeating talking points of the lunatic left
listen yourself
He says in 2009 that Iraq is a QUAGMIRE when we already won!! He blames the war on bankers and whoever, and not a word about blaming it on terrorists!
listen yourself, Schiff repeats left wing talking points to his radio audience about the Iraq war!
Ive told you now 3 times, go to schiff’s own website
do an advanced google search
ad in www.schiffforsenate.com as the website, google kokesh
there is a letter endorsing both of them
google campaign for liberty
search for the videos on youtube
on each video of their atlanta rally, it is only 3 candidates they promote:
SCHIF
KOKESH
RAND PAUL
Schiff is joined at the hip with Kokesh and th eMarxists who send him money
otherwise, he would be denouncing all this
After all, YOU would denounce any association of you with David Duke, right?
Schiff has NEVER denounced his connection to Kokesh unless he is with him all the time
Peter Schiff admits on camera that he has ZERO money investigated in American corporations or industry
RB -
I am a Connecticut voter.
I’ve always been concerned about Schiff’s rather laid back attitude towards this race. I wasn’t aware of any connection to Adam Kokesh until now.
However, Forras is trailing the other three, and the other two are RINOs.
I remain undecided. Help me out here
1 - The first priority is to defeat the democrat. What is the possibility of making Forras a viable candidate?
2 - I’m not sure I agree with your assessment of a danger by an analogy of Kokesh = David Duke. It is a little upsetting that they are so strongly linked, but Kokesh doesn’t rise to the level of Klansman as far as PR issues are concerned.
3 - Wouldn’t it be better to focus efforts on attacking Blumenthal? For example, there should be a strong effort to force him to challenge Obamacare. Obamacare is very unpopular in Connecticut, insurance capital of the world.
I am going to help Forras get some attention, but we certainly need to get this out about Schiff
What is prolematic is Forras wont beat McMahon due to lack f name recognition, the media didnt invite him to let him get exposure!
So, we can call all the talk radio shows and announce his name and send them to his website
oh, as for the Kokesh thing being weak, well, think about it
Read all the other links I provied near the end of this thread
Schiff is an isolationist like Kokesh
Schiff is against the Iraq war like Kokesh
Schiff doesnt invest in America, he invests all his money overseas, and expects us to call that patriotic??
If those dont sound like an IVAW/ANSWER/CODE PINK person, what else do we need?
Add in his hundreds of name mentions with Kokesh on the net...
QED
It would be rare to find someone who is both an isolationist and a libertaian. In what regard is Schiff an isolationist? (I’m asking, not challenging you)
Schiff invests overseas...at present, that is just better investment of his own money. I don’t think that is a reflection of his patriotism (or lack of)
His Iraq position IS troubling though...
watch the video
I guess that was about the time I stopped being a $50 per month donor. This is why I am stunned that Jim Robinson would support the RLC who do not support our Military or their Mission. I know that Jim Robinson does, but why then would he support the RLC?
You turned against freerepublic because it doesn’t support Mitt Romney?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.