Thanks for the link, reprobate. The author appears qualified to raise the question.
Brett’s interview today was a win for America!
Clearly, whatever was O’s plan, it failed.
It is not always possible to get even a single answer from a guest that is nonresponsive, evasive, controlling and intimidating. Usually the next best thing is to remain polite and allow the difficult guest to sputter and ramble as Brett did.
The interview also suggests
- Roger Ailes at the moment yet controls the format at FOX;
- the O Team may not be as efficient as some believe; and,
- while perhaps remote, it placed O in such a bad light that one or more insiders may, in fact, be working for O’s downfall.
As you point out, how much longer will we have FOX?
Thanks for the post and the ping.
Yes, Brett did an excellent, ballsy interview.
Did you see him interviewed on O’Reilly? He specifically said that his goal was to ask the questions nobody else was asking. He did that in spades.
“As you point out, how much longer will we have FOX?”
I di not trust Murdoch or the Saudis but I think Roger Ailes is probably a good guy. He is making a TON of money for Murdoch. Cavuto did a great job launching Fox Busines News too.
I think Bret Baier is also an honest and decent guy.
Shep Smith, O’Reilly and now Beck? Not so much.
Sean Hannity is a decent guy but he has too many RINOs and Dems on his shows. I trust Dick Morris more than I trust Newt or McCain. Strike that - I Do NOT trust stinking RINOs Newt (I will FU NY-23 for Repubs) Gingrich and Juan McCain.