Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reforming the Department of Energy in the Bottom Line Challenge
Big Bureaucracy ^ | March 6th, 2010 | Ellie Velinska

Posted on 03/06/2010 3:06:30 PM PST by Big Bureaucracy

The Department of Energy was created by President Jimmy Carter in 1977 after the oil crisis. The idea was to end the United States dependence on foreign oil. How’s that working out for you, America?

Carter and every President after him promised Energy independence and never kept his promise. If the same old Department of Energy is not doing the job – it is time to reform the thing and hopefully save some bucks in the process.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has a blog named the Bottom Line. Big Bureaucracy entered their “spending challenge”. So far we identified savings in bureaucracy cuts, stimulus money cuts and education cuts.

Let’s take the hatchet and go line by line through the 2011 budget of the Department of Energy proposed by President Obama.

There are certain activities performed by the DOE that should be transferred back to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers where they originally started. That would be the following:

- Strategic Petroleum Reserve; - Science; - Environmental Clean-up (Defense and non-defense); - Power Marketing Administration.

Atomic Energy Defense Activities (weapons, naval reactors and defense non-proliferation) should be transferred to Department of the Army.

Energy Information Administration should be transferred to Economics and Statistics Administration (Department of Commerce).

The budget for the Departmental Administration should be transferred to Department of Defense for the transition.

Loans that were already made by the Department of Energy should be transferred to the Treasury to be serviced until paid.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigbureaucracy.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: budget; energy; energydepartment; myarticle; myblog

1 posted on 03/06/2010 3:06:30 PM PST by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Big Bureaucracy

The last I had heard was that the department of energy had not created any energy.


2 posted on 03/06/2010 3:15:35 PM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Bureaucracy
We need to take the hatchet to a bunch of useless fedgov departments. Take a look at Health and Human Services. Who knew they have a larger budget than the DOD? What the hell do they do?


3 posted on 03/06/2010 3:17:26 PM PST by FReepaholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

Agree with you. In the CRFB challenge - I started with the easy things - cutting the Stimulus spending,closing Dept. of Education - now the Energy. Health Department is full of waste - I am still observing their 2011 budget - HHS is a big fat mess!


4 posted on 03/06/2010 3:21:46 PM PST by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Big Bureaucracy
"The Department of Energy (DOE) has four main missions: 1) ensuring a dependable energy supply for the American economy;(FAIL) 2) ensuring a secure, reliable nuclear deterrent for the nation’s defense;(Currently being reduced by Obama) 3) improving environmental quality related to energy production;(FAIL - we arguably increase enbironmental quality, but don't produce energy) and 4) advancing science and technology in energy-related areas.(FAIL - no viable alternatives to fossil or nuclear fules) The Department supplements private-sector research efforts to enhance domestic energy production, develop new and cleaner sources of energy, and improve energy conservation and efficiency."

16,000 federal and 100,000 contractors 2003 Spending: $19.8 billion

FOR WHAT? http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/rewrite/budget/fy2004/energy.html

5 posted on 03/06/2010 3:53:12 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

For 30 years they failed in each of their goals. Time to close that thing.


6 posted on 03/06/2010 4:06:33 PM PST by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Big Bureaucracy

yep


7 posted on 03/06/2010 4:10:41 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

The Dept of Labor has a huge budget. Too bad there aren’t more folks working in the US! Maybe they should look into that!


8 posted on 03/06/2010 4:29:10 PM PST by Sunbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sunbunny

I’m okay with just the mint and the military...everything else is negotiable.


9 posted on 03/06/2010 4:30:43 PM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Big Bureaucracy

Reform? How about elimination? Along with Department of Education and others.


10 posted on 03/06/2010 4:31:51 PM PST by ataDude (Its like 1933, mixed with the Carter 70s, plus the books 1984 and Animal Farm, all at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ataDude

If you go to the end of the article - you will see I am closing the Dept. of Energy


11 posted on 03/06/2010 5:56:03 PM PST by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sunbunny

Agree, I think of reforming/closing the Department of Housing and Urban development next.


12 posted on 03/06/2010 5:58:00 PM PST by Big Bureaucracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson