Replies

"Real journalists try to find the best evidence and verification."

Only for genuine controversies. For fabricated controversies that have no evidence in their favor, journalists are reasonable people and understand exactly when the evidence they have is good enough to draw a conclusion and then move one.

" Since his files have all been closed, by him, real journalist would keep probing."

There is no evidence that a single "file" has been "closed, by him."

Obama's "files" are protected by laws that preceded his rise to the Presidency, that have nothing to do with him personally, and that also protect your privacy and mine. He has not had to raise a finger or pay a penny in any venue to "close" anything. He has shown no hesitancy to release otherwise private information completely voluntarily when it made sense to do so, such as his tax returns and even the original COLB. That he does not release other information when it does not make sense to do so is hardly mysterious.

Now... if the tiniest shred of evidence was ever provided by a Birther that indicated there was a real story here, the press would be all over it like white on rice.

Your problem is not that that journalists will not look at your "evidence." It is that they have looked at your evidence and concluded that it is a joke.

You are wasting your time. I am seeking truth and you are nit piking details and making false statements. Obama will not release his records to the public and you say "There is no evidence he has closed his files."

If you don't believe me or the comments by the officials in Hawaii that they can't release without his permission, then pprove me wrong. Get a copy of the records for yourself and experience the "transparency."

Our highest public official has not opened any of his passport, selective service, school, or birth records and perhaps you haven't heard, he is fighting doing so in various courts.

I am seeking the truth by having the information made public. Waht is it you are doing?