To: EnderWiggins
Real journalists try to find the best evidence and verification. Since his files have all been closed, by him, real journalist would keep probing.
To: votemout
"Real journalists try to find the best evidence and verification."
Only for genuine controversies. For fabricated controversies that have no evidence in their favor, journalists are reasonable people and understand exactly when the evidence they have is good enough to draw a conclusion and then move one.
" Since his files have all been closed, by him, real journalist would keep probing."
There is no evidence that a single "file" has been "closed, by him."
Obama's "files" are protected by laws that preceded his rise to the Presidency, that have nothing to do with him personally, and that also protect your privacy and mine. He has not had to raise a finger or pay a penny in any venue to "close" anything. He has shown no hesitancy to release otherwise private information completely voluntarily when it made sense to do so, such as his tax returns and even the original COLB. That he does not release other information when it does not make sense to do so is hardly mysterious.
Now... if the tiniest shred of evidence was ever provided by a Birther that indicated there was a real story here, the press would be all over it like white on rice.
Your problem is not that that journalists will not look at your "evidence." It is that they have looked at your evidence and concluded that it is a joke.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson