Replies

All those involved in the coverup deserve to be indicted.

Nancy Pelosi clearly commits FRAUD in the Obama vetting process!

It is obvious that Nancy Pelosi and possibly many other DNC officials knew darn well Obama was illegal when they certified him on the ticket.

The details are right here in Exhibit 1 and 2.

Exhibit 1 clearly has the wording:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution:

But Exhibit 2 specifically leaves out the qualifying verbage:

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:

So why is this fraud? It is very simple:

Pelosi and the DNC obviously prepared 2 documents but discarded the first in favor of hiding the truth and to CTA (cover their ass). It was the second document (the Exhibit 2 document) that was delivered to the Election Commission and is now of record in forty-nine of the fifty state Election Commission offices, state DNC headquarters, complete with date stamps, matching signatures, even the same Notary of Public authentication, but absent the constitutional text.

Not only is this fraud, it is a conspiracy as multiple people were involved with the cover-up.

Declaring that a presidential candidate is elegible IS NOT the sole responsibility of one state or representative of that state. Every US state that allowed BO’s name on the ballot is on the hook for dereliction of duty in NOT verifying creds in the first place. I mean really.... taking nancy pelosi’s word on something like this???? Right - and I’ll respect you in the morning too!

Where in the world did these documents come from? If they were covering up the first one with the second one, then how in the world did the first one survive to see the light of day?

I looked keenly at the documents, the titles are the same and the signatures appear to be the same people but not photostat copies of each other. In other words when I make my signature it differs slightly each time I make it and the signatures on the docs you posted show they are indeed separate signings.

So either this is extremely meticulous clever photoshopping or they are real, and if they are real then yes it is fraud.

But the question remains, where did the first one above come from? Why was it not destroyed?

The person who kept the first one must be part of he DNC legal arm, no?

Also did Pelosi realized she was exposing herself to liability by signing the first? Or does she just sign whatever her lawyer puts in front of her? Because when she signed the first and then the second, then it is proof she knew the reason for doing so. And if she knew the reason for doing so, then she would have destroyed the first because it would be a huge fraud she was abetting. She would have insisted that knowledge of the creation of the first document be held at the highest security level of her office and that it be destroyed with no traceability.

Just wondering: How did Pelosi know that Obama was "legally qualified"?

Did Pelosi see Obama's 1961 Hawaii long form birth certificate?

My point is this: If Pelosi did see Obama's 1961 Hawaii long form birth certificate---the one with the name of the birth doctor and the name of Obama's birth hospital---then shouldn't we the public also be allowed to see it?