I looked keenly at the documents, the titles are the same and the signatures appear to be the same people but not photostat copies of each other. In other words when I make my signature it differs slightly each time I make it and the signatures on the docs you posted show they are indeed separate signings.
So either this is extremely meticulous clever photoshopping or they are real, and if they are real then yes it is fraud.
But the question remains, where did the first one above come from? Why was it not destroyed?
The person who kept the first one must be part of he DNC legal arm, no?
Also did Pelosi realized she was exposing herself to liability by signing the first? Or does she just sign whatever her lawyer puts in front of her? Because when she signed the first and then the second, then it is proof she knew the reason for doing so. And if she knew the reason for doing so, then she would have destroyed the first because it would be a huge fraud she was abetting. She would have insisted that knowledge of the creation of the first document be held at the highest security level of her office and that it be destroyed with no traceability.