What kind of idiotic statement is that? She is currently NOT disbarred. She is fighting the $20K fine legally. Going after Obama, without the benefit of being defended by the Government lawyers (which we pay for), IS relevant, as he committed (or its purported that he committed) fraud BEFORE he became President. What part of her being able to pursue this, don’t you understand?
To me, a “Birther” is a “Constitutionalist”...and anything said to the contrary, is diversion from simple facts.
Grow a set America...we were duped... well 51% of us were.
Obama is a constitutional scholar, so he did this with malice aforethough... ie...He knew what he was doing when he did it.
It is not even clear if he is a US Citizen, but it IS clear that he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen (NBC).
It is not even clear if he is a US Citizen, but it IS clear that he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen (NBC).
It’s clear to most of us.
As far as most of the country, the courts, and the laws believes there are two types of US citizens.
native/natural born
naturalized
Nowhere in our history has the court ever mentioned that there is some other type of citizen.
Therefore, if Obama is a citizen he is one or the other. According to Hawaii he was born in Hawaii. He gained his citizenship at birth not through naturalization THEREFORE he is a native/natural born citizen.
If you care to dispute his native/natural born citizenship please provide one of the following:
1) a Court opinion after Wong Kim Ark which actually states that we have more than two types of citizens and what those other types are
2) proof he was not born in Hawaii
Hatred of a politician is not a good enough reason to upend our entire judicial/legal history. Saying it is so doesn’t make it so.