[EnderWiggins]

"As a result, it appears to this author that Wong Kim Ark really does not add precedent nor provide a final clarification of the natural born citizen definition."

It appears that real judges in real courts disagree with you. For example, this ruling from just a few months ago rather clearly uses Wong Kim Ark to decide otherwise:

-------------------------------------------
Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.
--------------------------------------------

Ankeny v. Gov of Indiana

[Danae]

BAWAHAHAHAHAHA

Sorry that case was not even decided in a circuit court and I fully expect it to be overturned should it be appealed. 200 years of case law goes against it.

So if I were you I would not be resting your case on a decidedly erroneous ruling by an ignorant judge in Indiana! LOL It is laughable.