To: EnderWiggins
BAWAHAHAHAHAHA
Sorry that case was not even decided in a circuit court and I fully expect it to be overturned should it be appealed. 200 years of case law goes against it.
So if I were you I would not be resting your case on a decidedly erroneous ruling by an ignorant judge in Indiana! LOL It is laughable.
489 posted on
02/13/2010 7:31:21 PM PST by
Danae
(Don't like our Constitution? Try living in a country with out one.)
To: Danae
Wigg and the other troll keep on putting forth that drivel from the Indiana court like it really settled everything for Obama.
To: Danae
"Sorry that case was not even decided in a circuit court and I fully expect it to be overturned should it be appealed. 200 years of case law goes against it."
When it actually is overturned, then come back and let us know. I the meantime, it demonstrates what I intended it to demonstrate... that real judges in real court rooms deciding real cases consider Wong Kim Ark to be "good law."
And they consider "natural born citizen" to be the same as English common law has insisted for a half millennium at this point. Born on US soil. Full stop.
As an aside, six of the current Supreme Court Justices have also favorably cited WKA in rulings before the court. So I wouldn't hold your breath on this Supreme Court overturning WKA itself anytime soon
Oh, and one more thing. You write:
"So if I were you I would not be resting your case on a decidedly erroneous ruling by an ignorant judge in Indiana!
Actually, it was panel of three judges that issued that decision. So if they are "ignorant" it sucks to be a Birther, as that ignorance is pandemic among American jurists. And they are the ones whose opinion really matter.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson