By definition and by law, you are wrong. A certification of live birth is a birth certificate.
You're FOS, noob
The COLB forgery ONLY states a birth took place, not to where or when or other vital statstics.
Please tell us the name of the witnesses, and doctor, the hospital.
The Dr Rodney west story, was debunked in mere hours.
By the constitution of the United States it states that the President must be a natural born citizen. That requires a document called a BIRTH CERTIFICATE which states the CITIZENSHIP of the PARENTS. The COLB does not have that information on it. If you have not been following this issue then you would not realize that FOREIGNERS can register a birth in the state of Hawaii.
Which nonetheless contains much less information than the original "long form" birth certificate. It contains virtually no information that would allow for verification. About all that can be checked is that the mother did live in the location specified, but only to level of city. But due to 'granularity' of the records, if they exist at all, it may be impossible to verify that the mother lived there at that time.
With the long form, doctor's name, wether he/she practiced at the hospital indicated, wether the mother lived at the *address* indicated, can all theoretically be cross checked.
Also given that the COLB is a computer generated abstract, it's ridicously easy to forge, since the forgery will also be computer generated form. Leaving only the seal and signature stamp to be carefully faked.