[Britt0n]

So believing that our government could have had a part in the 9/11 attacks makes a person a nut and not a viable Tea Party candidate?

[nhoward14]

That’s right.

[fish hawk]

Yep

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

With the likes of Van Jones and Rosie on board......yes.

[Allegra]

So believing that our government could have had a part in the 9/11 attacks makes a person a nut and not a viable Tea Party candidate?

Yes. If the Tea Party movement wants to stand on its original intent, there really is no need for the Ron Paul Cult to infest it and turn it into some weird Libertoon, Truther, anti-war movement.

That would significantly change the original intent of the Tea Party movement. And we already have a Ron Paul Cult Libertoon-Truther-Anti-War movement, anyway.

[ejonesie22]

Yes and Yes.

[pasquale]

So believing that our government could have had a part in the 9/11 attacks makes a person a nut and not a viable Tea Party candidate? YES

[GregoTX]

"So believing that our government could have had a part in the 9/11 attacks makes a person a nut and not a viable Tea Party candidate?"

YES!!!
Anyone who seriously considers a government conspiracy played a part in the 911 attack is a nut and can not be trusted in any job that holds a public trust.

[wyokostur]

My very first, {{sniff, wipes tear from eye}} IBTZ!!

[onyx]

So believing that our government could have had a part in the 9/11 attacks makes a person a nut and not a viable Tea Party candidate?

You have to ask?

[sonic109]

Yea , why you don’t think so ? Are you for real?